- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Court panel upholds verdict finding Trump "liable for sexually abusing" E. Jean Carroll
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:17 am
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:17 am
What a load of BS. No evidence. Claims nobody was in a popular store when it happened. Can't remember dates of when it occurred. This is our "Justice System"
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
12
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:18 am to John Barron
"Court panel"
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:19 am to John Barron
WTF is a court panel?
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:20 am to John Barron
quote:
Court panel
I would love to know the demographics and party affiliation of this panel.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:20 am to John Barron
So what are Trump's next options
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:20 am to John Barron
That woman is a lunatic. And a liar.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:23 am to John Barron
What evidence did they use to convict him of this sexual abuse?
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:23 am to John Barron
Next up, SCOTUS
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:25 am to John Barron
"A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan."
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan."
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:26 am to udtiger
2nd Circuit was never going to reverse.
Mind you, this is the federal case for the same alleged conduct that the State of NY case resulted.in the $83 million verdict (stemming from the "Get Trump Act"). THAT decision is still winding it's way through the appeal process.
Mind you, this is the federal case for the same alleged conduct that the State of NY case resulted.in the $83 million verdict (stemming from the "Get Trump Act"). THAT decision is still winding it's way through the appeal process.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:27 am to John Barron
Total horseshite
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:28 am to udtiger
quote:
Next up, SCOTUS
Amazing something like this has to go to the Supreme Court to get corrected
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:29 am to John Barron
quote:
and later defaming
This is what the verdict is for.
quote:
liable for sexually abusing
This is what they want you to think it is for.
This post was edited on 12/30/24 at 9:29 am
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:31 am to SaturatedPhat
quote:
This is what the verdict is for.
I thought there were 2 cases. 5 million for sexually abusing. Then 83 million for defaming
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:46 am to John Barron
The court was made up of 3 Democrats.... This was a political trial. Should have never been found liable, but civil courts are unpredictable. I doubt she ever gets paid.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 9:48 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What evidence did they use to convict him of this sexual abuse?
Hearsay. It’s admissible in a civil proceeding and is NOT a conviction.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:07 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
Hearsay. It’s admissible in a civil proceeding and is NOT a conviction.
Hearsay is never admissible unless it falls under certain exceptions, or is no objected to.
You are correct that one is not "convicted" or found "guilty" in a civil proceeding. You are only "liable" or "not liable."
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:08 am to allin2010
quote:
Should have never been found liable, but civil courts are unpredictable
So you can have no evidence and can not remember dates and also say nobody was in a popular store when it happened and still Win a Civil Trial?
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:09 am to John Barron
This is why no one respects the Court now. Obvious corruption.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:14 am to John Barron
quote:
So you can have no evidence and can not remember dates and also say nobody was in a popular store when it happened and still Win a Civil Trial?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News