- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This is the MSM... They just set a record
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:22 am
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:22 am
13
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:23 am to BCreed1
Per the open minded independents, it’s really not a big issue.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:23 am to BCreed1
Take out Fox News and redo the percentages.
ETA: Fox isn't included, dummy me.
ETA: Fox isn't included, dummy me.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 8:26 am
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:24 am to BCreed1
Not sure how they quantified this, but I believe it.
I assume it's more than 85%.
I assume it's more than 85%.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:24 am to Mushroom1968
Fox isn't included. It's just ABC, nbc, and CBS
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:25 am to SportTiger1
quote:
Fox isn't included. It's just ABC, nbc, and CBS
Ahh, bad eyes on my part. I see now
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:25 am to BCreed1
i don't believe those numbers. it's much worse
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:26 am to BCreed1
and they wonder why no one trust them anymore... 
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:27 am to BCreed1
If you take away Fox, its more like 100 and 0.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:28 am to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
don't believe those numbers. it's much worse
Agreed.
I’d love to see examples of the 15% positive mentions they are claiming.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:29 am to BCreed1
IF, AND ONLY IF they are counting Fox, Newsmax, and OAN as mainstream media outlets are those numbers even fricking close to being in the ballpark.
Without counting all three as being in the mainstream media, there is no fricking way Trump has gotten more than 5% positive coverage. And usually, that’s by fricking mistake.
As far as Kamala, there’s no f*cking way she has gotten anything less than 99% positive coverage. The only time she doesn’t get positive coverages is when they forget to edit her fricking speeches or interviews. And the reason she gets negative coverage there is because she’s comes off as being literally f*cking retarded all on her own.
Without counting all three as being in the mainstream media, there is no fricking way Trump has gotten more than 5% positive coverage. And usually, that’s by fricking mistake.
As far as Kamala, there’s no f*cking way she has gotten anything less than 99% positive coverage. The only time she doesn’t get positive coverages is when they forget to edit her fricking speeches or interviews. And the reason she gets negative coverage there is because she’s comes off as being literally f*cking retarded all on her own.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 8:32 am
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:30 am to BCreed1
This is why Trump won’t win in a landslide.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:34 am to Rip Torner
It is a huge issue for the shallow minded sheeple in this country.....they accept gaslighting as the truth.
I hope TRUMP dissolves the media as we know it....it will be glorious.
I hope TRUMP dissolves the media as we know it....it will be glorious.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:40 am to Rip Torner
SFP will be here to enlighten us on why this is a false narrative as soon as he finishes his morning session of pleasuring himself. No one loves him like he does.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:41 am to BCreed1
Just imagine if the media was actually fair and didn't outright lie and take quotes out of context to influence the election. Trump would be up damn near double digits in the popular vote.
Pretty much tells you all you need to know about the Democrat party. Everything stacked in your favor (i.e. news media, academia, hollywood, voting laws, etc) and will probably still lose the election. Its like having a Madden team with all player attributes set at 99 and having the refs paid off and still losing because you suck.
Pretty much tells you all you need to know about the Democrat party. Everything stacked in your favor (i.e. news media, academia, hollywood, voting laws, etc) and will probably still lose the election. Its like having a Madden team with all player attributes set at 99 and having the refs paid off and still losing because you suck.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 8:44 am
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:44 am to BCreed1
No way hers is that low.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:47 am to Hooligan's Ghost
They probably count anything neutral as positive for Trmup and negative for Harris.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:52 am to BCreed1
Shocked, it wasn't higher
Posted on 11/2/24 at 8:53 am to BCreed1
They should be fined and locked up. This is election interference
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:00 am to BCreed1
By the standards of the board, I’m woefully un-MAGA, but I’m surprised these numbers aren’t even worse. The MSM doesn’t even try to appear unbiased anymore. Also, even when they don’t slant the text, they’re still slanting the context by what they choose not to say. I heard a NPR report yesterday morning on the dust up over the comedian calling Puerto Rico garbage and except for a lead-in referencing Trump’s “history of racist remarks,” the report itself was fine. But I kept waiting for some reference to “the Harris campaign also working to address a controversial comment President Biden made about Trump supporters.” But no way, they just acted as if it didn’t exist. Even a source like NPR would have been more evenhanded 15-20 years ago. TDS is real.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News