Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Biden choosing Kamala as VP came back to bite him and the Dem Party in the arse

Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:27 am
Posted by Saunson69
Stephen the Pirate
Member since May 2023
8230 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:27 am
Popular theory is that Biden purposefully chose Kamala not based on merit but solely to win the black and female vote. After all that is 58% of the population there. 51% female, 7% black male.

Considering there's never been any woman ever elected, the odds are against a B/F to ever win even with the votes from all CA, MA, NY, NJ, etc. That's not even mentioning how she doesn't have the sharpness it takes to be president. Trump and Vance are both lightyears ahead in aptitude, awareness, and IQ compared to their counterparties.

I'd also like to compare resumes of both the current VPs

Vance:
Yale Law School (Ranked #1 of 196 US Law Schools, #1 Law School in the world)
Ohio State (#43 US university)
Marine
Accomplished this despite grandparents who were alcoholics and raised him
Father was absent, abused the family when there
Mother was drug user, unstable boyfriends who took it out on JD, mother was in and out of his life
Very poor lifestyle in Appalachia area.
Just a phenomenal story.

Kamala:
UC Hastings (ranked #82 of 196 US Law Schools)
Howard University (ranked #115 US university)
Despite all these extremely wealthy advantages, and parents who went to elite global universities of Stanford and Berkeley to influence how she thinks, she still went to low ranked universities:
Mother had PhD from Cal Berkeley and was a professor at a hospital and did research.
Father was a professor at Stanford and got PhD from Cal Berkeley
Father lived in Palo Alto (everyone there is very rich)
She went to all Private Schools growing up

One VP came from shite and turned out gold. The other came from gold, parents who went to the most elite institutions in the world who parented her in that manner, yet still managed to go to an average university and below average law school. Their debate will be comical at how JD runs circles around her.
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 2:37 am
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3667 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 3:47 am to
all this and you don't realize biden didn't have an ounce of choice in his running mate.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
11493 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 4:17 am to
Most voters don’t care about ‘resume’ they care about optics. Also, 50% of our voting population are idiots. Keep that in mind.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 5:34 am to
If the Democratic evil twin version of JD Vance was VP right now Joe would have been removed before that debate.... or dead already.

She and the fact she would have control over the campaign's war chest is the only reason Joe is alive today.
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
9141 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 5:44 am to
quote:

Biden choosing Kamala as VP came back to bite him and the Dem Party in the arse
Yes. He sold out to get Clyburns endorsement and win SC. Before that, Bernie was running away with the nomination.

It didn’t bite then Dem Party in the arse as it wasn’t their decision to make. Had Sanders won, the establishment Dems would have been pissed having to answer to a fringe President (had Bernie won).

But yeah, they are in a bad spot with her around. It’s like that friend that nobody wants to invite to the beach trip. But dump her, and alll hell will break loose.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
23995 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 6:27 am to
quote:

all this and you don't realize biden didn't have an ounce of choice in his running mate.


James Clyburn picked heels. That was the deal for his support.
Posted by chrisharrisbaby
Member since Mar 2014
728 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 6:34 am to
quote:

below average law school.


Did you look at their notable alumni before saying this? Most of them are senators, judges, AGs, etc



Also the median ranking would 98, so a school ranked 82 would quite literally be above average.
Posted by Milesahead
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
692 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 7:19 am to
quote:

Also the median ranking would 98, so a school ranked 82 would quite literally be above average


When people say they were an average student, you think that means exactly in the middle? C'mon man!

82 is within 10% of the mid point. I think the majority would reasonably have no quibles with calling it average.
Posted by chrisharrisbaby
Member since Mar 2014
728 posts
Posted on 7/19/24 at 8:03 am to
quote:

82 is within 10% of the mid point. I think the majority would reasonably have no quibles with calling it average


Which I agree with; it's the below average comment that's just factually incorrect.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram