Started By
Message

re: Boy Scouts of America changing name to be more inclusive

Posted on 5/7/24 at 11:39 am to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96865 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 11:39 am to
Not sure why the bitching to allow females was allowed to take root.

If it was about Girl Scouts not having Eagle, they could start their own comparable program.


But this is all about destroying or corrupting existing institutions instead of improving existing ones.
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
5460 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 11:44 am to
quote:

If it was about Girl Scouts not having Eagle, they could start their own comparable program.


Exactly, I am not against girls learning those skills. But augment your own organization. There was a reason there were GIRL scouts and BOY scout organizations. Sad. I think these boys now could really benefit from old school boy scout learning.

Time to make a new organization. The Baw Scouts ™
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124908 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 11:50 am to
quote:

But this is all about destroying or corrupting existing institutions instead of improving existing ones.


Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
10957 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

If it was about Girl Scouts not having Eagle, they could start their own comparable program.


They do, the Gold Award.

quote:

“Letting girls in”


The problem, as my FIL put it, is that the Girl Scouts don’t really do the outdoorsy/camping thing the boys do because not a lot of the leaders like doing it, but some girls do like the camping, or have fathers that would prefer they learn something useful
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram