- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Doctor at Cigna Said Her Bosses Pressured Her to Review Patients’ Cases Too Quickly.
Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:37 am to LSUfan4444
Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:37 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
People in this country already don't have enough vested stake in their healthcare or conditions but continually point the finger at other people and expect someone else to pay for things that don't actually improve their condition.
This isn’t a loaded question because I’m one of those that are pretty ignorant about it. I agree with the posters here that say if it’s meets the criteria of a partnered doc, it should be covered.
What’s your solution?
Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:43 am to supadave3
quote:
I agree with the posters here that say if it’s meets the criteria of a partnered doc, it should be covered.
I do agree that fi something meets criteria it should be covered but thats not really what the article is describing. It's describing something that doesnt meet criteria.
If there is something that a medical director reviews because it already doesn't meet standard criteria (meaning the nurse who initially reviewed it flagged it for denial) that decision falls to them. Another medical director reviewing the same case could have a different opinion and approve it so for those cases that are denied, the patients do have appeal rights to have the request reviewed by third party review sources which are clinicians for another opinion.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News