quote:
If he signed a cert after his initial transfer of boxes and documents to the government saying he had given them all he had and Corcoran had done the same, ANY subsequent classified documents found is a violation of the law

That has just got to be a much more horrendous crime than:
- removing top secret docs from a SCIF by hiding them in your sox
- removing top secret docs form a SCIF and storing them in your garage
- presenting manufactured lies to a FISA court
- etc et al ad infinitum

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Timeoday

Easter Island

Member since Aug 2020

9528 posts

Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:08 am to ChineseBandit58

They even have the appeal regarding the ILLEGAL APPOINTMENT of Jack Smith sitting on the back burner. POTUS Trump and his lawyers are just letting the DC CORRUPTION expose itself.

This post was edited on 5/4/24 at 10:13 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by KiwiHead

Auckland, NZ

Member since Jul 2014

28048 posts

Posted on 5/4/24 at 11:46 am to ChineseBandit58

It kind of is. It's one thing to have uncovered documents in your possession and alerting the DoJ to the fact. It's another thing to ostensibly comply with a subpoena, say you have turned over documents and then have it uncovered that you knew you did not turn them all over and then by omitting that force another person , namely your lawyer to then attest to something that you know to be mostly to patently untrue. .

You do realize , of course you do, that Sandy Berger was prosecuted for docs in the socks and worked out a plea deal with the Bush DoJ.....or did you plan to omit that from your argument?

We're down to one, Bandit, and we largely agree about the abuse and FISA

But that does not mean that Trump should be considered lily white clean in this matter. He fricked around with a legit federal subpoena that his own lawyers told him that if you do not turn in everything and you certify that you did, it could be considered a crime.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by SWCBonfire