- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:59 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:59 pm to Indefatigable
Having to jump all the way to murder to demonstrate a point on the matter I think is somewhat telling, and yes I know you weren’t the one who introduced that example. I think we would probably find much, much more common ground on the issue in that particular instance. But alas we’re back in the far opposite direction on severity of the alleged crime at hand.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 9:00 pm to davyjones
My reply wasn’t intended to be adversarial. I’d wager you and I land in the same corner on the merits of Trump’s charges. Though I don’t think the severity of the criminal charge is relevant to the core constitutional analysis.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 9:02 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News