- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:49 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:49 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Relevance?
The other poster made a statement that Congress can declare POTUS in contempt and have him prosecuted.
They can do no such thing because POTUS isn’t subject to congressional summons or subpoena, and thus cannot be in contempt thereof.
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:50 am to Indefatigable
quote:
They can do no such thing because POTUS isn’t subject to congressional summons or subpoena
I think records can be subpoenaed.
But any punishment for violating this would likely need to be political, not criminal, due to Separation of Powers. THAT is when impeachment comes into play directly.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News