Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:42 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124376 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Not a criminal case
Literally irrelevant. Separation of powers addresses that.

quote:

Prior to removal, POTUS can also be prosecuted.
Cite the case, ruling or precedent.

quote:

Then you need to change the Constitution.
It is a matter of interpretation, just not your interpretation. You need to understand that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424666 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Cite the case, ruling or precedent.

Quoted prior to your post.

That case involved prosecution first (acquittal), and then impeachment-removal. During the criminal case, he made the literal same argument, and was rejected (joining another appellate circuit).

quote:

It is a matter of interpretation, just not your interpretation

And every federal appellate court who has had to rule on it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram