- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:37 am to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:37 am to Robin Masters
quote:
“The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”
Right, it is up to congress to get him removed from office through impeachment and then allow for a criminal trial to take place. That is the method available to provide check and balances of a president. SFP knows this, but he wants the DOJ to be able to bring a president up on charges and trial even as a sitting president.
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:42 am to JellyRoll
quote:
Right, it is up to congress to get him removed from office through impeachment and then allow for a criminal trial to take place.
Literally not what it says.
quote:
SFP knows this, but he wants the DOJ to be able to bring a president up on charges and trial even as a sitting president.
Bro I'm arguing based on the words of the Constitution and actual court cases on the subject. You're just making shite up.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News