Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:32 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30109 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Clearly you did NOT read that article.


“In this article I intend to address why the constitution protects a sitting president from indictment”.

quote:

Even the article states every federal appeals court who has ruled on this, ruled the way I said


You’re such a disingenuousness hack and now I know you didn’t read the article because he addresses those rulings and why they aren’t relevant to the president.



This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 8:34 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424675 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:39 am to
quote:

You’re such a disingenuousness hack and now I know you didn’t read the article because he addresses those rulings and why they aren’t relevant to the president.

His arguments are shite and have never been adopted by any court of note, for that reason.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram