- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:28 am to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:28 am to Robin Masters
quote:
And you’ve just been owned by an actual lawyer, judge and constitutional law scholar.
Clearly you did NOT read that article.
Even the article states every federal appeals court who has ruled on this, ruled the way I said.
Also, his paper is only about state court prosecutions of a sitting President.
That article has nothing to do with this thread (discussing a federal prosecution of a person who is not currently President).
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Clearly you did NOT read that article.
“In this article I intend to address why the constitution protects a sitting president from indictment”.
quote:
Even the article states every federal appeals court who has ruled on this, ruled the way I said
You’re such a disingenuousness hack and now I know you didn’t read the article because he addresses those rulings and why they aren’t relevant to the president.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 8:34 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News