- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:18 am to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:18 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Federal judge and constitutional law scholar Jay Bybee with a very thorough essay on why SFP is wrong:
You clearly didn't read that. First of all, that article is only about state prosecutions while the President is in office. It's inapplicable to this thread for both reasons.
quote:
Not to mention the main author of the constitution, Alexander Hamilton:
“The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”
Again, and? That just argues my point.
You embarrassed yourself on this point this weekend. Do you really want round 2?
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, and? That just argues my point. You embarrassed yourself on this point this weekend. Do you really want round 2?
It says no such thing. And you’ve just been owned by an actual lawyer, judge and constitutional law scholar. Enjoy your bag of dicks. Wish I could stick around to watch you eat them but I have people who need me. Unlike you apparently.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News