- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: t-Official 2024 NFL DRAFT Thread
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:47 am to wildtigercat93
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:47 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
More likely because
So just spitballing to try to prove your point now
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:50 am to Jon Ham
quote:
Who would you say could legitimately play RB, TE, and WR better than Bowers?
I think Jaheim Bell could do the RB part better than Bowers could as a TE. But neither of them are going to take many, if any, snaps at RB in the NFL.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:50 am to VolSquatch
Yeah we’re both just bullshitting on the internet man with no actual intel, No different then you assuming they trade up for the 5th year option, what are we doing here
Pats were heavily attached to leggette and the panthers wanted him bad. Not a huge logical jump to say that’s why they were motivated to move up a spot. That’s pretty much always the reason to trade up.
Pats were heavily attached to leggette and the panthers wanted him bad. Not a huge logical jump to say that’s why they were motivated to move up a spot. That’s pretty much always the reason to trade up.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:51 am to VermilionTiger
quote:
Higgins doesn’t seem likely with the Bengals not going WR.
If you get Higgins you're probably giving up 33. Cincy would just take a WR there.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:53 am to wildtigercat93
NFL GMs say they value the 5h year option, you can look at their actions and any rational person can see they value the 5tth year option...
Good question.
quote:
what are we doing here
Good question.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:55 am to VolSquatch
Moving from pick 133 to 95 and then also getting an additional pick in the 3rd is far better than a potential 5th year option man. That isn’t a question. Especially when you are in win now mode
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:56 am to VolSquatch
Again it is valuable for QBs, not really a huge deal for other positions, and evidence bares that out
But we aren’t really getting anywhere with this, so agree to disagree
But we aren’t really getting anywhere with this, so agree to disagree
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:56 am to lsupride87
quote:
Moving from pick 133 to 95 and then also getting an additional pick in the 3rd is far better than a potential 5th year option man. That isn’t a question. Especially when you are in win now mode
I literally said that for some teams its better to get more picks That definitely applies to a roster like the Bills have.
That doesn't mean the 5 year isn't viewed as being extremely valuable.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:57 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
But we aren’t really getting anywhere with this, so agree to disagree
No we aren't.
I am correct and I am trying to drag you from the shark infested waters of incorrect-ness, but you are determined to be eaten alive
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:52 am to lsupride87
quote:
Chiefs didn’t take the best WR from Texas….
But they did take one who is destined to catch a 75 yard touchdown pass from Mahomes with ten seconds left to win a playoff game against Buffalo sometime in the future.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:03 am to bcoop199
quote:
Between Hollywood Brown and Worthy the middle is going to be open for Kelce to work.
Yeah, everyone is going to play two deep coverage and leave the middle wide open for Kelce. Also Worthy averaged 16 yards on punt returns. Sarkeison also says that not only did Worthy know what routes every receiver was supposed to run on a given play, he knew the blocking responsibilities for every offensive lineman on every play. He was an academic All-American and should grasp the Chiefs offense quickly. A lot of comparisons to Desean Jackson. He might not be the right receiver for some teams but he fits the Chiefs offense perfectly. Also he is only twenty years old so adding muscle shouldn't be that tough.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:47 am to JodyPlauche
quote:
What is the purpose of all the high fives and hugs when you have pick #1? You have known who you were going to pick for a while now. You didn't do any work tonight.
It would have been better if the Redskins would have been high fiving after Chicago made one of the worst picks...ever!!!
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:55 am to MelGibsonPatriotGif
The Vikings gave up way too much to move up for Turner. Jags ended up getting their guy anyway.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:58 am to TheWalrus
I am just asking because I am unsure if it was correct or incorrect.
But if you are Chicago, doesn't taking Turner or Bowers at 9 make sense since you already had Williams at 1?
You could get the WR later in Rd 2, and you had traded or signed some WR during FA.
But if you are Chicago, doesn't taking Turner or Bowers at 9 make sense since you already had Williams at 1?
You could get the WR later in Rd 2, and you had traded or signed some WR during FA.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:21 am to VolSquatch
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:26 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:21 pm to RLDSC FAN
Sand right before that Ryan Clark started his race talk….
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:03 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
I feel horrible for Legette.
Why? He gets to play in the NFL a couple hours from where he grew up. And, he will have the thickest redneck accent of any player in the NFL, which will make him popular
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:36 pm to VolSquatch
Don't get the Pearsall hate, he's quick, a solid route runner, and most importantly loves to block. Not saying he will be a perennial pro bowl player but he has a very high floor.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News