- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:43 pm to GRTiger
quote:A key trait of a scientific observation is that it must be repeatable by others. If I can't replicate your results by following your documentation, you fricked up my baw.
In that case, I observe God daily in several ways my baw.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:46 pm to Korkstand
Maybe you just don't know how to do it. I know plenty of people that can repeat my process.
I certainly couldn't replicate all that science where they measured the density, size, and makeup of the singularity. Can you?
I certainly couldn't replicate all that science where they measured the density, size, and makeup of the singularity. Can you?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:49 pm to LSUDVM1999
This may ultimately change the ideal of a hot woman.
For instance, which will be the sexiest place that the third eye is located? Or the third ear, for that matter…
For instance, which will be the sexiest place that the third eye is located? Or the third ear, for that matter…
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:52 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
but they have evidence. someone said it. the word of a stranger is never false.
quote:
Corinthians420
Checks out.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:04 pm to GRTiger
quote:Yes I know plenty of people who have been brainwashed by cults, as well.
Maybe you just don't know how to do it. I know plenty of people that can repeat my process.
quote:Why can't you? Are you unable to learn things? If so that would explain a lot.
I certainly couldn't replicate all that science where they measured the density, size, and makeup of the singularity. Can you?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:06 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Yes I know plenty of people who have been brainwashed by cults, as well.
quote:
Why can't you? Are you unable to learn things? If so that would explain a lot.
I swear to the real God I was about to ETA to tell you I'm just having fun and maybe trying to make you think a different way for fun. I could feel your insecure arse seething and knew you were coming in hot with the tantrum.
Stop trying to hurt my feelings.
Btw, since you missed it, I guarantee you can't tell me the density or makeup of the singularity.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:22 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Btw, since you missed it, I guarantee you can't tell me the density or makeup of the singularity.
Easy peasy:
1/gawd = 8
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:25 pm to FutureMikeVIII
Gawd doesn't divide anything, son.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:27 pm to GRTiger
quote:It is extremely easy to get me to think a different way. All you need to provide is data and logic.
I swear to the real God I was about to ETA to tell you I'm just having fun and maybe trying to make you think a different way for fun.
quote:Ah right, I'm the insecure one seething and coming in hot. Meanwhile you're the one hitting refresh on the thread and replying within 2 minutes.
I could feel your insecure arse seething and knew you were coming in hot with the tantrum.
quote:I insult mostly for my own amusement. Whether or not it hurts your feelings doesn't make much difference to me.
Stop trying to hurt my feelings.
quote:I'm confident that I can replicate any or all of the observations and calculations involved in such, given the time. I don't know why anyone else wouldn't be similarly confident.
Btw, since you missed it, I guarantee you can't tell me the density or makeup of the singularity.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:32 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I'm confident that I can replicate any or all of the observations and calculations involved in such, given the time.
Well good luck finding it. Seriously, no black hole measurements include only the singularity. It includes all space and time up to the event horizon. That was just a little nugget for my amusement.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:43 pm to GRTiger
quote:And how do you think this differs from the way we measure most things?
no black hole measurements include only the singularity. It includes all space and time up to the event horizon.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:48 pm to Korkstand
Are some singularities bigger than others? Are they made of different things? I don't know this shite man!
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:53 pm to LSUDVM1999
quote:
In the 4-billion-odd-year history of life on Earth
There’s no way for them to know this definitively
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:28 pm to GRTiger
quote:Hey man, I don't know this shite either, but I'm sure we can get through it if we want to!
Are some singularities bigger than others? Are they made of different things? I don't know this shite man!
We can measure the mass of a black hole in a very similar way that we measure the mass of a nearby star or even your own body - measure the effects of gravity and do the math.
As for the size, first we'll have to figure out what size even means when space itself is ripped apart. Is there even a meaningful difference between assuming that the volume enclosed by the event horizon is of uniform density vs. a dimensionless point singularity with infinite density at the center of an event horizon? In either case, density can only be calculated if volume is defined, and the volume of a black hole can only be defined by its event horizon.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:41 pm to Korkstand
If you believe in the multiverse (or wormholes or the proverbial balloon) you can't believe the singularity has size, density, matter. It has to be an opening. If you believe there is a little ball getting denser and denser until it blows, then there should be one measured singularity out there somewhere.
It's unprovable what it is. Much like other things, amirite?
It's unprovable what it is. Much like other things, amirite?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:58 pm to GRTiger
quote:I don't follow your logic. Wormholes would be part of this universe. A multiverse would mean there are other universes, perhaps with their own unique set of constants and completely different than ours.
If you believe in the multiverse (or wormholes or the proverbial balloon) you can't believe the singularity has size, density, matter. It has to be an opening.
quote:Don't follow your logic again. Black holes get less dense as they grow more massive, not more dense. As far as I know, black hole density is calculated as mass over the volume enclosed by the event horizon. As mass increases, the radius of the event horizon grows linearly which means the volume grows to the third power. More massive = less density.
If you believe there is a little ball getting denser and denser until it blows, then there should be one measured singularity out there somewhere.
quote:What part is unprovable? Do you dispute the fact that black holes exist? Do you disagree that there is something there, that we can measure its mass, and that it interacts with the natural world?
It's unprovable what it is. Much like other things, amirite?
Your attempt to equate this with a belief in god is laughable.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 11:03 pm to Korkstand
You're conflating the space within the event horizon with the singularity at the very center. The singularity is actually the "black hole." The space within the EH is just sort of like the slide leading into it. It has mass, a charge, and rotation due to how they are formed and/or the rotation of the mass that was pulled in to become the accretion disk.
The event horizon can absolutely be measured and we have many times.
I might as well say God is at the singularity (some people probably do), it'll never be disproven.
Honestly if we found out in our lifetimes, I'd be pretty happy with any of the aforementioned outcomes.
The event horizon can absolutely be measured and we have many times.
I might as well say God is at the singularity (some people probably do), it'll never be disproven.
Honestly if we found out in our lifetimes, I'd be pretty happy with any of the aforementioned outcomes.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 11:14 pm to GRTiger
quote:Yes, intentionally. I even asked the question what difference does it make?
You're conflating the space within the event horizon with the singularity at the very center.
quote:I'd say the singularity is the singularity, the event horizon is the event horizon, and the "black hole" is the combo. But whatever floats your boat.
The singularity is actually the "black hole."
quote:Ok.
The space within the EH is just sort of like the slide leading into it. It has mass, a charge, and rotation due to how they are formed and/or the rotation of the mass that was pulled in to become the accretion disk.
quote:Did I suggest otherwise?
The event horizon can absolutely be measured and we have many times.
quote:I could say there's a bologna sandwich at the singularity and it would be more credible given that we have evidence that a bologna sandwich exists and thus could possibly cross an event horizon to join the other bologna sandwiches.
I might as well say God is at the singularity (some people probably do), it'll never be disproven.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 11:16 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 11:18 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Did I suggest otherwise?
No I was politely letting you know that your snide tone was unnecessary as I agreed with the part you incorrectly were talking about.
quote:
I could say there's a bologna sandwich at the singularity and it would be more credible given that we have evidence that a bologna sandwich exists and thus could possibly cross an event horizon.
And yet you've argued in defense of the multiverse, wormholes, and a measurable singularity.
When you continue to be this arrogant and condescending while getting battered about the head and neck, it really takes the fun out of it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News