- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Over the last 50 years, the marriage rate in the U.S. has dropped by nearly 60%
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:20 pm to funnystuff
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:20 pm to funnystuff
It takes 2 mins to google baw:
LINK
A head of household and an adult filing separately only hits the final 37% bracket at like 800k vs 700k filing married
It’s lower for EVERY bucket
LINK
A head of household and an adult filing separately only hits the final 37% bracket at like 800k vs 700k filing married
It’s lower for EVERY bucket
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 4/16/24 at 3:47 pm to fareplay
From your link:
A man making $220k pays 32%
He marries a woman making $80k, they pay 24%.
A man making $220k pays 32%
He marries a woman making $80k, they pay 24%.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:53 pm to fareplay
What are you talking about, man?… your link directly proves your statement wrong. Unless you were trying to say the opposite of what you accidentally said?
Because the charts clearly show that married joint filers pay lower rates than single individuals. Is that what you were trying to say? Because your statement was the exact opposite of that
$200,000 of income as a single individual pays 10% on the first $11,000, 12% from there to $44,725, 22% from there to $95,375, 24% from there to $182,100, and 32% from there to $200,000
$200,000 of income as a married couple pays 10% on the first $22,000, 12% from there to $89,450, 22% from there to $190,750, and 24% from there to $200,000
That feels like it significantly benefits the married couple, no? My apologies if saying it felt like a lie was an inaccurate reflection of your intentions… but I don’t really see where a claim that singles are advantaged over married couples comes from. Help me out here.
Because the charts clearly show that married joint filers pay lower rates than single individuals. Is that what you were trying to say? Because your statement was the exact opposite of that
$200,000 of income as a single individual pays 10% on the first $11,000, 12% from there to $44,725, 22% from there to $95,375, 24% from there to $182,100, and 32% from there to $200,000
$200,000 of income as a married couple pays 10% on the first $22,000, 12% from there to $89,450, 22% from there to $190,750, and 24% from there to $200,000
That feels like it significantly benefits the married couple, no? My apologies if saying it felt like a lie was an inaccurate reflection of your intentions… but I don’t really see where a claim that singles are advantaged over married couples comes from. Help me out here.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News