- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Iran saying it's done with attacking
Posted on 4/13/24 at 7:59 pm to ColtRange
Posted on 4/13/24 at 7:59 pm to ColtRange
quote:I've been saying it's impossible for ballistic missiles to take 3-4 hours to get from Iran to Israel. The timing doesn't make sense.
And you're still staying it didn't happen.
Maybe you can explain why it takes Iran's "ballistic" missiles that long to reach Israel from their launch sites in Iran.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 8:08 pm to LSURussian
I don't think they understand the difference between a 600 mph cruise missile and 15k mph ballistic missile.
subsonic vs hypersonic.
subsonic vs hypersonic.
This post was edited on 4/13/24 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 4/13/24 at 8:09 pm to LSURussian
This is a question that arises: could there be a scenario wherein Iran were to intentionally misrepresent the numbers of weapons popped off, and even though knowing full well of their blatant exaggerations, Israel lets the falsehood/propaganda go unmentioned for their own purposes? I’m thinking that scenario is very possible and perhaps even likely. Iran’s motivation would simply be to make themselves appear more aggressive than the reality, while Israel’s motivation would be to use it for their own propaganda purposes in terms of framing Iran’s actions as much more sinister than it may have been in reality. That would bolster a heavier grade of rhetoric against Iran for an array of possible reasons.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News