Started By
Message

re: Iran saying it's done with attacking

Posted on 4/13/24 at 7:59 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127010 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

And you're still staying it didn't happen.
I've been saying it's impossible for ballistic missiles to take 3-4 hours to get from Iran to Israel. The timing doesn't make sense.

Maybe you can explain why it takes Iran's "ballistic" missiles that long to reach Israel from their launch sites in Iran.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131553 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 8:08 pm to
I don't think they understand the difference between a 600 mph cruise missile and 15k mph ballistic missile.

subsonic vs hypersonic.



This post was edited on 4/13/24 at 8:10 pm
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30396 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 8:09 pm to
This is a question that arises: could there be a scenario wherein Iran were to intentionally misrepresent the numbers of weapons popped off, and even though knowing full well of their blatant exaggerations, Israel lets the falsehood/propaganda go unmentioned for their own purposes? I’m thinking that scenario is very possible and perhaps even likely. Iran’s motivation would simply be to make themselves appear more aggressive than the reality, while Israel’s motivation would be to use it for their own propaganda purposes in terms of framing Iran’s actions as much more sinister than it may have been in reality. That would bolster a heavier grade of rhetoric against Iran for an array of possible reasons.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram