Started By
Message

Tucker Commentary on FISA

Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:20 pm
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15569 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:20 pm
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Member since Oct 2023
652 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:36 pm to
Same guy.......SAME GUY was just in Russia praising Putin who does MUCH WORSE.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
54348 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:44 pm to
We've let like 9 million illegals in on Biden's watch and these shiteheads have the gall to talk about national security.

Even Catturd gets it.

Posted by Datbawwwww
Member since Oct 2023
444 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:46 pm to
Spot the hell on, as usual!
Posted by Sixafan
Member since Aug 2023
678 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:50 pm to
FISA- First Initiate Spying on Americans.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80549 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 6:52 pm to
Colonel Jessup was right.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
12234 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 7:03 pm to
I put up a video on this today - Johnson will fold, once again, as he has since be became Speaker. Maybe he's Jeff Sessions' long lost son. Both are disgusting cowards.

"Every word of that, a lie" - Tucker about Mike Turner on the intell committee, who is a stooge for the IC, trying to sell FISA.

Says DOJ called Chip Roy demanding he support re-authorization. Sounds like a threat.

Johnson's priorities are aligned with the Democrats' priorities. Tucker said, "Why even bother with the Republican Party if all they're going to do is ratify what Joe Biden wants?" - but people here will throw a tantrum if others like MTG want to throw the flag on Johnson.

And he has completely abandoned the border.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
7275 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 9:27 pm to
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64676 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 9:38 pm to
Weird comment at the end, "if the republicans ratify trump for the nomination"
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17117 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 10:23 pm to
I love how they lie and say Section 702 only authorizes spying on foreigners. If that were the case, it wouldn't be controversial in the first place.

What 702 does is authorize the surveillance of American citizens without warrants. If it didn't, then Congress wouldn't put a provision in the statute stating that 702 cannot be used to spy on Congress.

There are plenty of other "sections" of FISA that allows for foreign surveillance, so the notion that we need 702 to "stop terrorism" or "fight China" is preposterous. They only want 702 so they can spy on their domestic political enemies. Simple as that.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119560 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:12 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram