Started By
Message

re: Harold Perkins confirmed a couple of popular theories

Posted on 4/9/24 at 4:57 pm to
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28736 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

I still think execution was a lot of the problem on defense but if the coach has lost the players as pretty obviously House did due to personality, coaching style, whatever, House could have been a genius coach and it didn't matter because he was not the best teacher.



House isn’t a dumbass. He knows football and he knows X’s and O’s you don’t get to where he’s been without it. But it takes more than that to be a good college coach. It’s a tough job. You’re teaching a lot of these guys from basically scratch.

It didn’t help that he was apparently an a-hole.
Posted by saintslsupels
Member since Jul 2014
1872 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 5:05 pm to
Perkins said a few things that made House look bad. Main one I got is when he said Baker knows how to fit his scheme to his players.

Bad coaches only know how to run their one scheme and force the scheme onto the players regardless of fit. Thats the easiest way to figure out that House doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Posted by Dotarian
Midwest
Member since Oct 2012
909 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

House isn’t a dumbass. He knows football and he knows X’s and O’s you don’t get to where he’s been without it. But it takes more than that to be a good college coach. It’s a tough job. You’re teaching a lot of these guys from basically scratch.

So what you're saying is that House would make a better defensive analyst than coach?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram