- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Was John Mason (the Rock) actually James Bond? Interesting similarities
Posted on 4/5/24 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 4/5/24 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 4/5/24 at 12:27 pm to RD Dawg
very similar.
Interesting.
Interesting.
Posted on 4/5/24 at 12:29 pm to RD Dawg
Can’t strain my mind thinking about it, so I’ll say sure, he’s Bond. He was amused by the orange Volvo if I’m remembering the movie correctly.
Posted on 4/5/24 at 4:46 pm to RD Dawg
I could definitely buy it, and truth be told, it fits perfectly if you want to maintain a coherent timeline.
As pointed out, Mason's capture and incarceration fits perfectly into the period where Connery leaves and Roger Moore steps in.
Various nefarious villains know of Bond by name, but not by face. Hence, the iconic introduction, where he casually drops the "Bond, James Bond" on them.
So British intelligence keeps the lead 00 guy as "Bond", carrying on the aura of invincibility- and also maintains deniability for the guy in US custody. "Bond" is on a mission to wherever, so you OBVIOUSLY don't have him locked up.
This might also explain why "Bond" continuously gets reintroduced to "Felix Leiter", the CIA operative he works with. Same type of codename, used to indicate to "Bond" that this guy isn't a rookie, he's on the same tier. And again, a different guy in a lot of the movies. Seems like as many Leiters as there are Bonds.
As for why he'd be kept in lockdown, it would be clear Leiter wouldn't reveal who he is unless requested; and it would be equally clear that whoever this dude was, he was "elite and important".
As pointed out, Mason's capture and incarceration fits perfectly into the period where Connery leaves and Roger Moore steps in.
Various nefarious villains know of Bond by name, but not by face. Hence, the iconic introduction, where he casually drops the "Bond, James Bond" on them.
So British intelligence keeps the lead 00 guy as "Bond", carrying on the aura of invincibility- and also maintains deniability for the guy in US custody. "Bond" is on a mission to wherever, so you OBVIOUSLY don't have him locked up.
This might also explain why "Bond" continuously gets reintroduced to "Felix Leiter", the CIA operative he works with. Same type of codename, used to indicate to "Bond" that this guy isn't a rookie, he's on the same tier. And again, a different guy in a lot of the movies. Seems like as many Leiters as there are Bonds.
As for why he'd be kept in lockdown, it would be clear Leiter wouldn't reveal who he is unless requested; and it would be equally clear that whoever this dude was, he was "elite and important".
Posted on 4/5/24 at 5:19 pm to RD Dawg
All those points might work except for the last one. I think he called him sailor because he came in with Navy Seals.
Posted on 4/5/24 at 6:36 pm to RD Dawg
Yes. It was written that way and the timeliness match up.
Posted on 4/5/24 at 6:41 pm to RD Dawg
And oldie but an goodie.
I can see it.
Posted on 4/5/24 at 9:00 pm to RD Dawg
I always assumed it was since the first time I watched it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News