- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DJT is the most expensive stock on the market to short - up to 900% annually
Posted on 4/3/24 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 10:46 pm
CNBC
Holy shite
quote:
You need a lot of cash — and guts — to short Trump Media stock right now.
Trump Media, which began being publicly traded last week, is now far and away the most expensive U.S. stock to sell short, according to S3 Partners, a leading financial data marketplace platform.
quote:
But plenty of people are still willing to pay those steep costs, based on their belief that Trump Media’s share price is bound to fall dramatically from its Wednesday closing of $48.81. Investors who wanted to borrow Trump Media shares to sell them short on Wednesday would have had to pay annual financing costs of between 750% and 900% of the price of the stock, said Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director of predictive analytics at S3 Partners.
That means a short seller of the DJT ticker who took a position Wednesday would have had to pay costs of between about $1 and $1.22 per day to the lenders.
To break even on a new trade after one month, a short seller would have to see the share price of Trump Media drop by more than $30.
Holy shite

quote:
But getting shares to borrow to sell short is increasingly difficult. Out of about 5 million shares of Trump Media available to short, 4.94 million have been already borrowed, which drives up the financing costs.
This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 12:26 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 11:14 pm to slackster
Never bet against the Orange Man
Posted on 4/4/24 at 5:06 am to slackster
quote:
would have had to pay costs of between about $1 and $1.22 per day to the lenders.
These "lenders" are the ones who are making the real consistent bank when it comes to politically related emotion driven stock activities. It would be interesting to know who owns the shares that they are using.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 6:08 am to Beessnax
quote:
It would be interesting to know who owns the shares that they are using.
It’s usually banks, funds, PE and the like. People talk about “relationships” being important on Wall Street for moments like this. You want to borrow a high-demand stock that everyone’s gunning for? It pays to be buddies with the guy who just happens to have some of it in their diversified portfolio.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 7:44 am to slackster
Another example of why people who say just "short it" don't understand.
The best play for these meme/fomo types of securities are to just sit on the sidelines. A new one will replace it shortly after this crashes and burns
The best play for these meme/fomo types of securities are to just sit on the sidelines. A new one will replace it shortly after this crashes and burns
Posted on 4/4/24 at 9:04 am to slackster
They talked about this on the All In podcast and how shorting this stock is for lunatics. The people who are going to buy and hold aren't doing it for money, they're doing it with a passion as intense as the WallStreetBets apes with GME.
Yes it's wildly overvalued but anyone trying to short is going to pay out the arse and the Trump crowd would gladly hold on to a goofy stock to see that happen.
Yes it's wildly overvalued but anyone trying to short is going to pay out the arse and the Trump crowd would gladly hold on to a goofy stock to see that happen.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 9:10 am to Thundercles
It's a meme stock with absolutely nothing to support its current value...which makes shorting it risky...like GME. The question is how long will boomers (and sadly gen xers) actually hodl. They're not unemployed zennials with covid bucks.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 9:14 am to slackster
quote:
But getting shares to borrow to sell short is increasingly difficult. Out of about 5 million shares of Trump Media available to short, 4.94 million have been already borrowed, which drives up the financing costs.
This tells me that it's not investing dollars, it's activism...
Posted on 4/4/24 at 9:37 am to BCreed1
His last stock is on the OTC market for six cents but
enjoy the ride on this . No institution is buying this for clients. Only suckers need apply
enjoy the ride on this . No institution is buying this for clients. Only suckers need apply
Posted on 4/4/24 at 9:41 am to slackster
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/… Trump Will Be World's 7th Richest Person, Says Peter Schiff, If MAGA Investors Push Newly-Listed DJT Stock To $2K
quote:
Renowned economist Peter Schiff has made a bold prediction about the potential rise of Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ:DJT) stock and its impact on former President Donald Trump‘s net worth. What Happened: Schiff, in a post on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday, wrote, “If MAGA investors push $DJT to $2k per share, Trump will be the 7th richest person in the world, just ahead of Bill Gates.

This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 9:45 am
Posted on 4/4/24 at 9:52 am to Kjnstkmn
tCult loves to give him $, so it’s a possibility. 

Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:16 am to slackster
In all manners Trump related, there is no sense that can be made of it.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:18 am to slackster
Dealers learned their lesson since GME AMC CAR and DWAC prior gamma squeeze.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:45 am to Beessnax
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/21/24 at 11:09 am
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:59 am to lsuconnman
quote:
It’s kind of funny to see the posts taunting the people who bought the shares for $70 to identify themselves. …They’re doing just fine renting those shares out for $1/day.

Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:36 pm to lsuconnman
quote:
It’s kind of funny to see the posts taunting the people who bought the shares for $70 to identify themselves. …They’re doing just fine renting those shares out for $1/day.
Wait you think all/many of the are getting paid the $1/day?
This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 4/5/24 at 12:41 am to slackster
quote:It's the newest moved goalpost talking point that this person obviously didn't even know about before others brought it up in these threads. Look what a hero they are - sure, the stock is down 40% from where I bought it...but I'm lending it out!
Wait you think all/many of the are getting paid the $1/day?

Posted on 4/5/24 at 11:41 am to Big Scrub TX
I plan on buying some call options for December or January. If he is elected again this will skyrocket and if another catalyst happens prior to that same results
Posted on 4/6/24 at 9:49 pm to CajunTiger78
quote:
plan on buying some call options for December or January. If he is elected again this will skyrocket and if another catalyst happens prior to that same results
Is it worth taking a flyer on this?
The fundamentals look bad and the stock is tanking. On the other hand, there is the potential for a short squeeze and you might be able to profit from volatility by selling on a spike.
Posted on 4/7/24 at 4:54 pm to Bestbank Tiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/8/24 at 8:58 am
Popular
Back to top
