Started By
Message

re: Pecking order at WR

Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:30 pm to
Posted by 304tiger
West Virginia
Member since Jan 2022
725 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:30 pm to
IMO, it would be a bad look if we took Daniels and Thomas in the portal to be backups, considering the other positions that are weak or thin.

Also, I thought we gave Daniels a big NIL deal. I can’t see him not starting.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279432 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

it would be a bad look if we took Daniels and Thomas in the portal to be backups, considering the other positions that are weak or thin.


The best players will play. Who cares how it looks
Posted by Ready2Geaux
Member since Sep 2023
247 posts
Posted on 4/3/24 at 12:19 am to
quote:

IMO, it would be a bad look if we took Daniels and Thomas in the portal to be backups, considering the other positions that are weak or thin.

Also, I thought we gave Daniels a big NIL deal. I can’t see him not starting.


It's still spring ball--why project and worry about who starts? Hankton will get things settled in due course because the best dudes will start

Players aren't promised starting roles and they generally learn a new system/new plays behind incumbent veterans but seems likely at least 1 of the portal WRs would be "first string"

I hope all this year's receivers put 10000 catches on the jugs machine a la Chase Terrace and JJ - I don't care who starts so long as they minimize drops
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27224 posts
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Also, I thought we gave Daniels a big NIL deal. I can’t see him not starting.


How is this relevant to anything?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram