Started By
Message

re: GATOR scholarship bill successfully gets through LA subcommittee

Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:41 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69358 posts
Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:41 pm to
LINK

This article is a good summary.

Also, as to your point about subsidies increasing prices. Yes, according to basic microeconomics, subsidies increase equilibrium price, but the price increase is less than the subsidy amount, due to the upward sloping supply curve. As price increase, so does supply.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37157 posts
Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Switchers generally yield fiscal savings to taxpayers because they are opting out of a higher-cost public school that they otherwise would have attended without the program. By contrast, non-switchers are a pure cost to taxpayers, because, under the program, taxpayers are now paying for an education that the non-switcher student’s household would have otherwise purchased.


That is EXACTLY the issue. The article also points out that LA has a higher percentage of students already in private schools (i.e non-switchers)

If I'm reading the article correctly, it estimates net cost to the state, on the low end, of $150M and on the high end, $400M, annually.

And while that is a small percntage of the money the state spends each year on total public school spending (and an even smaller percentage of the state budget), it's still $150 - $400 million a year in new spending, which must be paid for with taxes (bleh) or other spending cuts (cool... what are we cutting).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram