- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How much would we have won by with normal refs?
Posted on 3/11/24 at 9:32 am
Posted on 3/11/24 at 9:32 am
We were easily the better team and IMO the way we played we would have won by 10-15 with a normal called game.
Its amazing how Birmingham won't let win the conference.
Its amazing how Birmingham won't let win the conference.
12
Posted on 3/11/24 at 9:41 am to dallastiger55
They have beaten us like 14 straight times or something.
They are the more complete team.
But Mulkey has us nipping at them and will eventually break through the wall.
At that point, Dawn will be Dusk as the sun sets on South Carolina.
They are the more complete team.
But Mulkey has us nipping at them and will eventually break through the wall.
At that point, Dawn will be Dusk as the sun sets on South Carolina.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 9:47 am to dallastiger55
We still wouldn’t have
Posted on 3/11/24 at 9:51 am to dallastiger55
quote:
How much would we have won by with normal refs?
If there's anything I've learned from watching both men's and women's college basketball, watching college football, watching college baseball and softball, it's this:
THOSE WERE NORMAL REFS.
They're all fricking terrible.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 9:56 am to dallastiger55
quote:
We were easily the better team
That's a stretch.
quote:
IMO the way we played we would have won by 10-15 with a normal called game.
Do you think so? Do you think officiating accounted for a 17 to 22-point swing? I think LSU could have won it with better officiating, sure, but I don't see a 17-point swing unless LSU also cleans up their passing as well. Too many turnovers and too many poor shot selections.
These are two telling stats.
Turnovers LSU-17, SC-13
FGs LSU-25/67 for 37.3%, SC-28/65 for 43.1
Here are a couple of surprising stats to me
Fouls LSU-15, SC-16 This seemed like it would have been a bit different based on the calls that were missed on SC.
Rebounds: LSU dominated here, particularly on the offensive glass.
Off LSU-17, SC-11
Def LSU-27, SC-26
Total LSU-44, SC-37
Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:17 am to dallastiger55
We played like shite. Way too many turnovers and missed layups.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:57 am to dallastiger55
If we shoot 4 less air ball layups, we win. Or even 4 less layups that hit the underside of the backboard.
It was a pathetic display.
It was a pathetic display.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:59 am to dallastiger55
Posted on 3/11/24 at 4:27 pm to dallastiger55
The team would have won if it hadn't gone cold for a period of time in the second half. It wasn't the refs. It's 100% in the control of this team whether they win it all.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:30 pm to dallastiger55
Missed layups and points off of turnovers lost the game. Turnovers didn’t seem too lopsided, but they were in open space and SC outmatched LSU guards for easy points.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:31 pm to dallastiger55
We easily win that game with even mildly competent refs that weren’t corrupt. Make no mistake about it, the gump refs had their marching orders. Birmingham will try its hardest to prevent us from having success.
This post was edited on 3/11/24 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:11 pm to dallastiger55
LSU wins by 5 points. Some of there players foul out, too.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 4:20 am to dallastiger55
Lack of depth gonna hurt in tournament
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News