- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So the employee that shot the robber is in custody
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:36 am to Padme
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:36 am to Padme
Sucky situation. Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store, it’s not, in that moment, a threat of death or injury to someone. If the employee had moved to physically prevent the theft and the thief then threatened the employee, the analysis would be different.
17
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:46 am to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing.
BS!
Sometimes stealing a person's car or other personal property is in effect killing the person who owns that property since the person can no longer do the work necessary to provide for themselves.
That's why in the past a horse thief was hung and looters were shot.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:47 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Well the problem with that is that you are waiting for the thug to use deadly force, at which time it’s too late. If thug is bashing a case violently then how do you know he isn’t fixing to use deadly force? You don’t, therefore it’s appropriate self defense to take action.
The law in DV cases completely follow this logic. A man can put his fist through a wall and be charged with DV, even though he hasn’t touched the woman.
The law in DV cases completely follow this logic. A man can put his fist through a wall and be charged with DV, even though he hasn’t touched the woman.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:59 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Should have blown him away before he had an opportunity to leave, then return for his bag.
Dead on the spot, end the guesswork.
Nine bullets make them count.
Dead on the spot, end the guesswork.
Nine bullets make them count.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:01 am to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store,
why couldn't the store owner have just waited until he pulled a weapon and shot at him first?
why couldn't he just shoot a warning shot into the air?
:insert video of store employee complying with robber then being shot to death 30 seconds later:
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 11:03 am
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:05 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing.
horseshite. I can think of 50 exceptions off the top of my head
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:11 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Another epically stupid comment. Your mental health condition is noted, seek professional help immediately. If someone is willing to steal in public in front of employees then what other illegal actions is he willing to take? Biden voting moron.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:37 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Sucky situation. Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store, it’s not, in that moment, a threat of death or injury to someone. If the employee had moved to physically prevent the theft and the thief then threatened the employee, the analysis would be different.
This is dumb, and you should feel dumb. Not only back in the day, when horse thieves and cattle rustlers were summarily lynched, but today, this very moment it is morally and legally justifiable to kill someone for stealing. If you don't believe me, go rob your nearest bank and see if people with guns come after you.
Your narrative is being sold to people who are so dumb they won't question it. It is done because they don't want you protecting your life, liberty, or property by any means necessary. They want you to leave that to the government, so that they get to decide whether your life, liberty, or property are worth defending. Pro tip: None of your possessions are worth defending. But the death penalty is not out of the question if you kick your feet up on Nancy Pelosi's desk.
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:51 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing
Thieves are subhuman scum who should be shot on sight.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 1:46 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Never is a long time. To steal a horse was a hanging offense because depriving a man of his transportation could kill him. Today’s equivalent is a car.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 1:47 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing
My property earns income that puts food on the table. If someone is a threat to that, then what choice do I have?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 2:34 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
How stupid are you?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 3:21 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing
Is it morally wrong to choke someone to death that was intent on Murder.
That is your democrat/communist position.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 4:26 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing.
What if I catch you trying to steal one of my other guns?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 4:29 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Sucky situation. Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store, it’s not, in that moment, a threat of death or injury to someone. If the employee had moved to physically prevent the theft and the thief then threatened the employee, the analysis would be different.
Must be a lot of untrained posters giving you the DVs because you are 100% correct. I fully support 2A but the laws do not authorize lethal force for stealing if no threat to person is made. Anyone attending concealed carry training will tell you that.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 5:16 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Thank God you're not in charge b/c there would be nothing good left in this country.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 5:29 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
frick that. Try to rob someone, you deserve to get shot.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:43 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Ya frick all that. I can think of plenty scenarios where it’s justified in both ways.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News