- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Hydrogen Vehicles
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:21 pm
Fairly comprehensive review of hydrogen as a fuel.
Points she seems unaware of:
1. Handling hydrogen was done routinely from the 1850's up until the mid-1950's in the form of Town Gas or coal gas. Super pressures are not some requirement.
2. There have been breakthroughs in fuel cell catalysts using base material and nanotech.
3. Nuclear is an ideal source to crack water for hydrogen because the hotter the water is the less power it takes to separate the hydrogen from the oxygen.
4. Yes, we have oceans of water and it does not require fresh water as an insurmountable hurdle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE
Points she seems unaware of:
1. Handling hydrogen was done routinely from the 1850's up until the mid-1950's in the form of Town Gas or coal gas. Super pressures are not some requirement.
2. There have been breakthroughs in fuel cell catalysts using base material and nanotech.
3. Nuclear is an ideal source to crack water for hydrogen because the hotter the water is the less power it takes to separate the hydrogen from the oxygen.
4. Yes, we have oceans of water and it does not require fresh water as an insurmountable hurdle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:26 pm to Auburn1968
It’s a solid energy source but handling, transport, and infrastructure will keep it from being anything significant for a long time.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:28 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Here's one....
Helium?
Or was it something like they usually filled it with Helium but they used Hydrogen for some reason?
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:31 pm to No Colors
quote:
Helium?
The Hindenburg was hydrogen, which is dangerously flammable. The accident caused airships to move to helium.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:32 pm to billjamin
quote:
It’s a solid energy source but handling, transport, and infrastructure will keep it from being anything significant for a long time.
Town gas was the main source of lighting and a major source of heating and cooking in the Northeast from the mid 1800's until the mid-1950's. It was about half hydrogen and half carbon monoxide.
The Northeast didn't stop using it until the natural gas pipe lines came up from the South in the 1950's.
My loft in NYC still had the old 3/8" gas pipes. They were black iron, but were damn near impossible to cut with a big saber saw or break with a heavy hammer.
correction 3/8ths ".
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:34 pm to billjamin
Bill
Solid, really?
quote:
It’s a solid energy source
Solid, really?
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:36 pm to Master of Sinanju
quote:
The Hindenburg was hydrogen, which is dangerously flammable. The accident caused airships to move to helium.
Interestingly, a lot of those onboard survived.
quote:
Survivors of the Hindenburg disaster far outnumbered the victims.
https://www.history.com/news/the-hindenburg-disaster-9-surprising-facts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:41 pm to Bedtiger
quote:
Solid, really?

Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:50 pm to Master of Sinanju
quote:
The accident caused airships to move to helium.
A lot of airships were already helium. At the time the US produced the majority of the world's helium and we wouldn't give any to Germany.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 6:54 pm to csorre1
Ran across these recently. Blimp aircraft carriers using helium. They were both lost in storms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airborne_aircraft_carrier


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airborne_aircraft_carrier
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 2/11/24 at 7:00 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
3 Nuclear Power Plants Gearing Up for Clean Hydrogen Production
https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/3-nuclear-power-plants-gearing-clean-hydrogen-production
Posted on 2/11/24 at 7:22 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Town gas was the main source of lighting and a major source of heating and cooking in the Northeast from the mid 1800's until the mid-1950's. It was about half hydrogen and half carbon monoxide.
You get that’s a far lower demand application and cars don’t have pipes connecting them to a grid, right?
And Storing pressurized hydrogen will always be a safety issue.
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 2/11/24 at 8:41 pm to Volvagia
quote:
And Storing pressurized hydrogen will always be a safety issue.
There are various methods some of which don't involve major pressure.
A gallon on ethanol contains more hydrogen than a gallon of liquid hydrogen. Read that in a scientific conference, but that requires cracking/reforming the source. Ideally, the source would be something like hydrazine in water which cracks easily and contains no carbon (which can kill some types of fuel cells).
quote:
Advanced Solid State and Liquid Materials
The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and the Office of Fossil Energy are working to develop innovative materials for reversible hydrogen storage including high surface area adsorbents, metal organic frameworks, and metal hydrides, as well as approaches that are regenerable off-board such as chemical hydrides and liquid carriers.
https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/program-areas/storage
Posted on 2/11/24 at 8:59 pm to No Colors
quote:
Here's one....
Helium?
Or was it something like they usually filled it with Helium but they used Hydrogen for some reason?
Oh, the Humanity!
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:23 pm to Auburn1968
you aware that hydrazine is a particularly toxic substance
Posted on 2/12/24 at 12:02 am to Auburn1968
Now you are talking about adding hydrazine to cars, with no idea of how much WORSE that is than pressurized hydrogen.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 12:09 am to Lonnie Utah

FDR ordered a mortar strike as it was landing
Popular
Back to top
