- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More people have watched the Tucker/Putin interview than the Super Bowl
Posted on 2/9/24 at 9:19 am to Fun Bunch
Posted on 2/9/24 at 9:19 am to Fun Bunch
That's pretty good. The half hour history lesson was a slog, but in the end explained at least their justification for the invasion.
Those areas were formerly part of Russia, hold ethnically Russian people, and they feel that it's in their best interest to return to Russian control.
These sorts of views are more common when your country has a 1000+ year history instead of ~250.
I mean, the borders of the United States and individual states have changed...do we expect them to stay the same forever?
Posted on 2/9/24 at 9:21 am to fr33manator
Tucker giving Putin 2 hours to explain his side to the American people was a good thing. It did seem like more of a press conference/lecture than an interview tho.
But you take what you can get.
There's no logical reason people shouldnt be allowed to hear putin speak.
Edit: besides the nefarious reasons of course
But you take what you can get.
There's no logical reason people shouldnt be allowed to hear putin speak.
Edit: besides the nefarious reasons of course
This post was edited on 2/9/24 at 9:22 am
Posted on 2/9/24 at 9:21 am to fr33manator
Yea people who didn't get the first part of the interview clearly don't understand how Europeans (and Middle Easterners for that matter) think about history
The American mindset on history is much shorter (and dumber I might add).
The American mindset on history is much shorter (and dumber I might add).
Posted on 2/9/24 at 12:48 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Those areas were formerly part of Russia, hold ethnically Russian people, and they feel that it's in their best interest to return to Russian control.
Did he discuss the holodomor which caused the ethnic changes?
quote:
These sorts of views are more common when your country has a 1000+ year history instead of ~250. I mean, the borders of the United States and individual states have changed...do we expect them to stay the same forever?
You gonna let Mexico take Texas in about a decade?
This post was edited on 2/9/24 at 12:50 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News