- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Knowles Prenup - Would you agree to it?
Posted on 1/28/24 at 8:06 pm to Dadren
Posted on 1/28/24 at 8:06 pm to Dadren
quote:
If you’re a great husband, why would a sane woman choose to live in complete misery?
Well, that sane woman is now incentivized to make her spouse so miserable and disgusted that he initiates. I think you can define ways to mitigate bad faith exceptions through. Certainly wouldn’t be more ridiculous than the current state. It’s something that should probably be explored further, but definitely not a one sentence fix. How do children impact any of this?
0
Posted on 1/28/24 at 9:29 pm to tiggerthetooth
You know tax laws?
Posted on 1/28/24 at 10:59 pm to Dadren
quote:
the red pill community
quote:I am so glad I was born in 1966 and don’t have to know what either of those things are
Daily Wire content creator
Posted on 1/29/24 at 4:16 am to Dadren
My modification would be you only leave with what you contributed during the marriage if it's a no-fault divorce. You contribute 20% then you only leave with 20%.
Posted on 1/29/24 at 5:42 am to Dadren
quote:
If you’re a great husband, why would a sane woman choose to live in complete misery?
Where the hell you been
Posted on 1/29/24 at 6:56 am to Dadren
quote:
Michael Knowles, (Daily Wire content creator)
Knowles and Walsh are every bit as cringe as the libs they complain about.
It doesn't seem like Knowles gave this one much thought.
This post was edited on 1/29/24 at 6:58 am
Posted on 1/29/24 at 7:20 am to Dadren
Sounds like something a desperate angry incel would propose
Posted on 1/29/24 at 7:41 am to Limitlesstigers
quote:
Women that file would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt of domestic abuse or infidelity and if they can’t they should pay 100% of their ex spouses legal bills and forfeit any type of spousal support.
What would be considered “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” in a civil court? A conviction? DV cases can stretch for months, so she would have to stay and endure abuse until he’s convicted? DV also isn’t just physical beating. Money withholding is often an issue in legitimate DV cases as a way to keep the victim in the relationship. Often times an abuser will also leverage the safety of the children.
Infidelity is another issue. Are just texts enough? Do you have to have video? Pictures? Cheaters can be very good at hiding things.
Posted on 1/29/24 at 7:47 am to SmelvinRat
quote:
Some people consider a slight eye-roll as abuse...
“He made me live everyday in abusive scenarios I made up in my head.”
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News