- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shapiro Is a Little Snake in the Grass
Posted on 1/20/24 at 5:09 pm to Zach
Posted on 1/20/24 at 5:09 pm to Zach
quote:
I check out all of his Youtubes and watch about half of them. It depends on topic.
He is amazing speaking to college audiences with Q and A.
It's easy to destroy left wing moron students but he does it so politely.
That's his claim to fame, a way to embed as a "conservative" influencer. He's a little neocon, just like another little frick Mark Levin.
quote:
The man is about as fiscally and socially conservative as they come. The MAGA wing of the party just dislike him because he doesn't worship at the altar of MAGA and will call out Trump on his bullshite when he sees it. However, the man voted for him twice and will vote for him again this November.
Nonsnese, we dislike him cause he's a neocon shill, just like Mark Levin. Two peas in a pod.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/20/24 at 5:15 pm
3
Posted on 1/20/24 at 5:15 pm to GetYouThatCope
quote:
GetYouThatCope
Posted on 1/20/24 at 5:17 pm to GetYouThatCope
quote:
The man is about as fiscally and socially conservative as they come.
ORLY?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 5:27 pm to GetYouThatCope
quote:
Nonsnese, we dislike him cause he's a neocon shill, just like Mark Levin. Two peas in a pod.
So wanting there to be peace in Ukraine with both sides being granted concessions is considered "neocon" in 2024?
From your link:
quote:
But we are now stuck in this weird binary strawman situation in which we are told that either we must fund Ukraine "until they win, as long as it takes," without defining winning or "as long as it takes"; or "we must stop the war in Ukraine" without defining what "stopping" looks like (does it mean withdrawing all aid, thus leading Russia to take Kyiv?).
What about the position that we have interests in Ukraine, that they do not match the Ukrainian interests entirely, and that we should fund Ukraine so as to prevent their takeover while pushing for a peace agreement that cedes certain territory to the Russians while granting security guarantees to the Ukrainians?
This post was edited on 1/20/24 at 5:28 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News