- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baldwin charged again
Posted on 1/19/24 at 3:21 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 1/19/24 at 3:21 pm to LNCHBOX
Explain how a rehearsal vs a take makes any difference here? You 100% are out for political blood
Your opinion on this means every actor needs to check air bags, safety ropes, gun props, etc anytime before they do a stunt scene with another actor. It’s a joke and you 100% know it
Alex Baldwin is 100% an assclown but you aren’t using logical or fair judgement at all
Your opinion on this means every actor needs to check air bags, safety ropes, gun props, etc anytime before they do a stunt scene with another actor. It’s a joke and you 100% know it
Alex Baldwin is 100% an assclown but you aren’t using logical or fair judgement at all
Posted on 1/19/24 at 3:22 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You 100% are out for political blood
You're such a fricking clown. Baldwin negligently killed a person.
quote:
but you aren’t using logical or fair judgement at all
fricking
clown
Posted on 1/19/24 at 3:40 pm to lsupride87
quote:
every actor needs to check
The difference here being that Baldwin was a producer of the movie and making on-site decisions that preceded the accident. Further, he allegedly refused training in some of the gun handling procedures he was set to perform.
Then coming out and declaring that he did not even pull the trigger, I just don't buy it. Yes, that is my opinion and not fact but those are the reasons people think he is a dickhead in this situation.
Posted on 1/19/24 at 4:25 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Explain how a rehearsal vs a take makes any difference here? You 100% are out for political blood Your opinion on this means every actor needs to check air bags, safety ropes, gun props, etc anytime before they do a stunt scene with another actor. It’s a joke and you 100% know it Alex Baldwin is 100% an assclown but you aren’t using logical or fair judgement at all
A movie set does not exclude someone from the laws of the jurisdiction that the set operates in. Here’s what the state needs to prove Baldwin guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of involuntary manslaughter:
1. Baldwin performed an act that could result in the death of someone ( he pointed a gun at someone with his finger on the trigger.)
2. Baldwin KNEW that his actions are inherently dangerous
3. Baldwin acted with a willful disregard of others
4. His act caused the death of someone
5. The crime happened in New Mexico
Points 1, 4, and 5 are slam dunks for the state - I don’t think there’s any disagreement between parties on those points.
Point 2 Baldwin will try to fight, but he’s not credible - already admitted in an interview that he would never point a loaded gun at someone. Also, he’s a gun control advocate and his dad was shooting instructor. Not many people can plead ignorance that a gun is an inherently dangerous object and extraordinary care must be taken when handling
Point 3 is where the legal battle will be. We already know Baldwin is trying to blame the prop masters, but the state has a lot of ammo with him being the producer, how he was going ad hoc without the armorer present, not taking other precautions such as remote cameras or shields to protect the woman killed. I’m sure the state will call actors/witnesses that detail how these things happened in Baldwin’s other movies.
LINK /
:
Posted on 1/19/24 at 4:56 pm to lsupride87
quote:my understanding was that the armorer wasn’t even on the set when this happened but everyone wants to blame her.
Explain how a rehearsal vs a take makes any difference here? You 100% are out for political blood
Maybe the rehearsal was a mock and the armorer didn’t even know the gun was being used?
It’s a 100 % fact he sure as hell knew the gun was being used
This post was edited on 1/19/24 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 1/19/24 at 5:01 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Explain how a rehearsal vs a take makes any difference here? You 100% are out for political blood Your opinion on this means every actor needs to check air bags, safety ropes, gun props, etc anytime before they do a stunt scene with another actor. It’s a joke and you 100% know it Alex Baldwin is 100% an assclown but you aren’t using logical or fair judgement at all
Sorry but I wouldn’t and neither would you get to use an excuse of, I didn’t know it was loaded.
It’s manslaughter. I don’t think he murdered the poor woman.
If you want to assign a portion of this elsewhere, that’s fine. He pulled the trigger. I can’t excuse not checking the gun if you are pulling the trigger. He’s at least one of the persons at fault.
This post was edited on 1/19/24 at 5:07 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News