- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

I'm not sure how this team improves via trade
Just looking at the roster there are pretty strong reasons NOT to trade most of the guys.
CJ - Most consistent shooter and vet leader.
Herb - Best defender, great contract.
BI - Arguably best playmaker. I still lean toward maybe him being the guy I'd trade but he has definitely leveled up on D lately and I don't think we would trade him anyway.
Zion - Probably the next guy I'd consider, but that effectively ends any title delusions we have.
Jonas - What we'd gain in rim protection, we'd lose in rebounding and offense.
Trey - Untouchable.
Jose - Fan favorite, spark plug and a good player against most teams.
Dyson - Elite defender and so young. Hate to give up on him this son.
Hawkins - Elite shooter who could be a cornerstone once CJ is gone.
Naji - Energy and culture guy. I would consider it since we probably can't afford him next year, but not sure what kind of upgrade he would bring.
Nance - I'd consider it but we'd miss his leadership and defense. Hard to imagine a better fit.
Kira - Clearly a salary dump.
Zeller - No sense moving him.
Earl - Same.
Liddell - Who cares?
So if we go consolidation trade, who are you willing to give up? Dyson? Hawkins? Jose? Gonna have to give up someone good plus picks. I don't know how far that pushes the needle.
Unfortunately, I think once again, we go as far as Zion takes us.
He gets back to last year's December Zion...we ride. If not, we are what we are. A middling playoff/play-in team.
That's the kind of trade i'd look for.
I'd rather trade the 2024 1st and whatever else is needed to get one of those 2. They get a half year to play and see if that's who we want going forward instead of JV.
If you could get Kessler for 2 1sts, without giving up Hawkins, that would be a great move imo, although i'm sure the Jazz think he's worth 8 1sts.
Wendell Carter Jr is apparently available and is someone i've liked but he's been injury prone so it would suck to lose JV's consistency for another injury prone guy.
I would bet that all we do is use a 2nd to dump kira, get out the tax and sign matt ryan.
It's not sexy but i really don't see a lot of upgrades for us that will be actually on the market
If they play up to their capability on defense, and are hitting their shots, you beat most teams like you did last night. Defense travels. Defense will also help you in the playoffs. I think what they lack is experience. There are very few teams that will have the bench output the Pels have.
Honestly, have we see a defensive output like last night when Zion is on the floor? I can't remember one.
What makes this team better, besides playing up to potential? Honest question, because I really don't know.
quote:
Honestly, have we see a defensive output like last night when Zion is on the floor? I can't remember one.
Just last week against the nets and wolves. Our defense was incredible and Zion was a part of that.
quote:
What makes this team better, besides playing up to potential? Honest question, because I really don't know.
IMO it's coaching. Willie becoming a better coach and having smarter rotations would be far more impactful than any realistic move we could make at the deadline
quote:
Jonas - What we'd gain in rim protection, we'd lose in rebounding and offense.
This is just wrong.
He's such a poor fit with the starters that we always close games with his backup, and he has played less than 23 minutes in our last four games.
I've said it before, but it bears repeating: last season, we were a combined -10 with Jonas on the floor and +208 with Larry.
It's not just that he can't jump. He's just too slow. He looked a little faster at the beginning of this season, and that was nice, but I think it's gone now.
Imagine a big who can help in transition -- on both ends of the floor. Imagine a big who can rotate to and close out on an open shooter. If you think that "rim protection" is JV's only weakness, you're fooling yourself.
And what JV does offensively is not integral to how we want to play. When the ball goes in to him in the post, he holds it for a second to figure out what he wants to do, then he takes several dribbles, etc. -- it's slow basketball.
And we usually don't need JV to create interior scoring opportunities for us, because we have BI and Zion, both of whom generate their points and assists inside the 3-point line. Seriously, what's a better play: a JV postup, or Zion/BI getting the ball at the top of the key?
If you tell me that JV's scoring is valuable when one of Zion and BI are off the floor, then that's fine, but it's not something that we need in our starting or finishing lineups. What you're telling me at that point is that JV is a good backup, which I agree with.
All this isn't meant to hate on him. He's a great guy and does a lot for us. And he certainly has value -- you could see that last night against Sabonis. But he's not a starter on any contending team.
quote:
against the nets
Meh.
quote:
wolves
Legit, but I don't recall it looking as crisp as last night. They were all over the place last night. Like guys were teleporting to the right places.
quote:My preference would be some combo of Naji/Dyson/Hawkins/picks.
So if we go consolidation trade, who are you willing to give up?
Herb or Jose could be added but Herb should be very costly and I hesitate to add Jose simply because his value in a trade I don't think can ever match his value on this team especially for the regular season, so I side with leaving Jose off that list.
We don't know who is available, but much like every year, more dudes will become available near the deadline, some being dudes we didn't even know were available.
Obviously you don't just trade for the sake of trading, but I'd say it's likely some upgrade will come available, and we should definitely be in the mix and trying to work the right deal for that person given they're a good fit here.
quote:Hawkins for Kessler? Phone that one in immediately.
Would you trade Hawkins to get back Mark Williams or Walker Kessler? I wouldn't want to, but i'd be open to it.
quote:
This is just wrong.
He's such a poor fit with the starters that we always close games with his backup, and he has played less than 23 minutes in our last four games.
I've said it before, but it bears repeating: last season, we were a combined -10 with Jonas on the floor and +208 with Larry.
It's not just that he can't jump. He's just too slow. He looked a little faster at the beginning of this season, and that was nice, but I think it's gone now.
Imagine a big who can help in transition -- on both ends of the floor. Imagine a big who can rotate to and close out on an open shooter. If you think that "rim protection" is JV's only weakness, you're fooling yourself.
And what JV does offensively is not integral to how we want to play. When the ball goes in to him in the post, he holds it for a second to figure out what he wants to do, then he takes several dribbles, etc. -- it's slow basketball.
And we usually don't need JV to create interior scoring opportunities for us, because we have BI and Zion, both of whom generate their points and assists inside the 3-point line. Seriously, what's a better play: a JV postup, or Zion/BI getting the ball at the top of the key?
If you tell me that JV's scoring is valuable when one of Zion and BI are off the floor, then that's fine, but it's not something that we need in our starting or finishing lineups. What you're telling me at that point is that JV is a good backup, which I agree with.
All this isn't meant to hate on him. He's a great guy and does a lot for us. And he certainly has value -- you could see that last night against Sabonis. But he's not a starter on any contending team.
I think you're mostly probably right.
So Allen makes the most sense probably as an potentially attainable big.
The question is, what are you willing to give up for him?
Would the Cavs even want JV? Dyson would be a very nice fit for Cleveland IMO. They have two very good scorers/poor defenders in Mitchell and Garland. Dyson as a third guard over another scorer like Lavert would be good for them. I feel there's some overlap between Mobley and Allen as well.
Would JV and Dyson and maybe a pick be enough? Would you do it?
quote:The overall team
What are you trying to improve?
quote:I don't think anyone truly thinks we can beat a Denver or a Boston, so upgrades should at the very least be explored.
If they play up to their capability on defense, and are hitting their shots, you beat most teams like you did last night. Defense travels. Defense will also help you in the playoffs. I think what they lack is experience. There are very few teams that will have the bench output the Pels have.
If we don't think we can comfortably beat every team in a playoff series, we should be exploring ways to improve the team.
quote:
I don't think anyone truly thinks we can beat a Denver or a Boston, so upgrades should at the very least be explored.
I'm much more confident vs Denver than I am Boston.
Boston will just 3 us to death and Porzingis weird grasshopper looking arse will be a pain at the rim. Denver has zero rim protection and we have the dudes to slow down Murray and Porter.
quote:
I've said it before, but it bears repeating: last season, we were a combined -10 with Jonas on the floor and +208 with Larry.
I don't think that's a secret. Larry fits better with Zion, simple as that.
I still think having JV/Larry combo is better than going get a $20M center that is going to do what Larry does. JV wins us games by himself in the regular season.
I know that come playoff time JV is not going to get to play much, but he's still needed in the regular season. I just don't see how Jarrett Allen makes us better. He has zero offense. There are other defenders out there that have no offense that are cheaper, and when i say cheaper, i mean salary wise. I don't care about giving up picks to improve.
quote:
If you tell me that JV's scoring is valuable when one of Zion and BI are off the floor, then that's fine, but it's not something that we need in our starting or finishing lineups. What you're telling me at that point is that JV is a good backup, which I agree with.
He really is, but i doubt he's wanting to do that.
I don't want to trade JV, but he's really the only peice to move to really improve the roster.
I just don't think $20M Jarrett Allen is the answer.
I'd rather look at something like JV for Claxton and Sharpe from Brooklyn. Claxton is undersized, which is why i'd want Sharpe as well.
quote:You may not be wrong but I think our chances of beating either right now are so slim that it doesn't matter that much if it's better/worse for 1 or the other. It's slim.
I'm much more confident vs Denver than I am Boston.
Boston will just 3 us to death and Porzingis weird grasshopper looking arse will be a pain at the rim. Denver has zero rim protection and we have the dudes to slow down Murray and Porter.
quote:
Kessler is arguably one of the best rim protectors in the league. I imagine he's untouchable. What's the point in trading him for Utah?
This summer, yeah he was untouchable.
Now, he's touchable. He's not having the same type of season he did last year. If he was untouchable, he'd be starting every game, but he's not. He's been better off the bench than he has been as a starter this year.
Back to top

10







