Started By
Message

re: RAM timings

Posted on 12/16/23 at 12:58 am to
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
66010 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 12:58 am to
It's just kind of how it is, much higher speeds with higher timings than DDR4.

Back when DDR5 was brand new the lowest CAS was 40, then 38, 36 and now at 30 which is where I bought in as they aren't expected to lower much more if any.
This post was edited on 12/16/23 at 12:59 am
Posted by Russianblue
Member since Nov 2007
1118 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 1:40 pm to
lol! I remember trying to overclock my 266mhz sticks and see if I could knock down to 1T timing and 2-2-2 latency!
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27405 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Back when DDR5 was brand new the lowest CAS was 40, then 38, 36 and now at 30 which is where I bought in as they aren't expected to lower much more if any.


I’ll be genuinely surprised if by the end of the DDR5 era we don’t have 6000/24 kits, possibly pushing better. A jump from 7ns to 10ns as best case first word latency would be unusual. We normally don’t lose more than 1ns between generations, and it’s usually a wash.

Now, how much that difference matters in the real world is a larger point of debate, and would be very task specific.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram