- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dante Moore plans to enter the portal
Posted on 12/1/23 at 11:52 am to public_enemy
Posted on 12/1/23 at 11:52 am to public_enemy
quote:
No matter who comes in, IF anyone even comes in, will be in competition against Nuss.
Nonsense. If a guy with little eligibility transfers in it's only because they got guarantees. There wouldn't be a competition in that case. Nobody is burning their last shot at the NFL on being a backup unless they've just accepted they aren't good enough.
quote:
I don’t think anyone is okay with just giving a guy the job just because he patiently waited. That’s not how a successful program is ran. If someone better than him is on the market you take him.
No, but many are ok with just giving the job to a transfer. Which is also not how a successful program is run.
quote:
If someone better than him is on the market you take him.
Again how do you know? Promising someone the start (like a Jefferson) is a risk and there was no competition. I also think other factors should play into decision making. Like how will it impact recruiting or the guys on the roster currently. Plus loyalty should be encouraged and thus rewarded. Not by handing the start, but by giving your guy a leg up over any transfer.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 11:56 am to TigerKnights
quote:
Nobody is burning their last shot at the NFL on being a backup unless they've just accepted they aren't good enough.
This could absolutely happen if we want experienced depth. Again WE DONT KNOW
quote:
No, but many are ok with just giving the job to a transfer. Which is also not how a successful program is run.
Their opinions don’t mean a fricking thing. None of us have any say so with the program. BK Denbrock and Sloan have shown they will play the best QB AND make him productive
quote:
Plus loyalty should be encouraged and thus rewarded.
These coaches are paid Millions to win. They’re only loyal to who they think will help them accomplish that.
Im not even sure why im still responding to you. Probably boredom. But your doom and gloom panic about people who aren’t even on our roster is exhausting and soft as frick.
If our coaches have not proved to you that they know what’s best on the offensive side of the ball, then you may as well go watch another team. (Which may be easier for you if Nuss does transfer)
Posted on 12/1/23 at 11:58 am to TigerKnights
quote:
Nonsense. If a guy with little eligibility transfers in it's only because they got guarantees.
When I called you out for saying this you tried to argue that it wasn’t what you meant.
I don’t think for a second that Kelly is going to guarantee anyone the starting job. Therefore, I don’t think that any veteran QB we get in the portal will have received guarantees.
This makes it less likely to get a veteran QB from the portal. It does not, however, mean that any veteran QB we do get from the portal will be guaranteed the job.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 9:25 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
No, but many are ok with just giving the job to a transfer. Which is also not how a successful program is run.
A successful program is run with competition throughout the roster.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News