Started By
Message

re: Josh Giddey accused of sleeping with underage chick

Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26014 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Well even by that definition, its not fair to call the guy a pedophile if the girl is over the age of consent.


And the age of consent is 17. What are you arguing here if she’s 16?
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16689 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

It’s bad to be proud of yourself, to showcase your clout?



When has it ever been a good thing to publicly account for your sexual conquests?

Is it only cool for girls to do it? I know Cardi B made millions by telling the world she has a really wet pussy. Is that what all the girls are striving for now?
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16689 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

And the age of consent is 17. What are you arguing here if she’s 16?


The age of consent is 16 and the girl is 17, is what i understand the situation to be. Where did it occur? In oklahoma the age of consent is 16.

I think very clearly im arguing that he shpuldnt be called a pedo if the girl is above the age of consent.
This post was edited on 11/23/23 at 12:29 pm
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26014 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:32 pm to
Fair enough. From what I’ve read we don’t actually know her age; however, the allegation is that she’s under age.

So by your definition he’s a pedo
This post was edited on 11/23/23 at 12:36 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
49622 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Is it only cool for girls to do it? I know Cardi B made millions by telling the world she has a really wet pussy. Is that what all the girls are striving for now?


I mean did it not help get Cardi where she is now? Would Pete Davidson be who he is if he was average?
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16689 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

But to say that that’s not considered pedophilia as matter of factly as you did is not correct. It’s 100% against the law and rubs against our cultural norm


No, you are incorrect here. It is 100% not against the law. And the laws are written based on our cultural norms. In fact, many of our grandmothers were married and pregnant by the time they were 17.


And you cannot stretch the term pedophilia to fit every situation that you dont 100% agree with. Thats what people have done with the term racism. Not everything is pedophilia and when you try to paint it that way it does a disservice to efforts to fight against real pedophilia.
Posted by GalacticaCannon
Member since Aug 2022
3746 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:37 pm to
Bro is in the NBA and could have plenty of legal IG hoes and he chooses the one he shouldn’t.
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
18413 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

The gap between 21 and 16 maturity wise is a chasm


I drove for uber for a few years and the LSU students I pick up at Tigerland, I'm really not so sure the gap is really that big lol. 21 year olds are just kids that can buy alcohol.
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16689 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

I mean did it not help get Cardi where she is now? Would Pete Davidson be who he is if he was average?




True. But are they good people?

Dont forget "catch me outside" girl. She is rich. Should everyone emulate her behavior?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
49622 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

True. But are they good people?


Do you know them? They might be

How old are you btw

Talking about this thread, none of these laws were written about dudes who weren’t far above any age of consent. Despite what Facebook moms may say, high school girls mess with dudes who just turn 21 all the time
This post was edited on 11/23/23 at 12:47 pm
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26014 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

No, you are incorrect here. It is 100% not against the law. And the laws are written based on our cultural norms. In fact, many of our grandmothers were married and pregnant by the time they were 17. And you cannot stretch the term pedophilia to fit every situation that you dont 100% agree with. Thats what people have done with the term racism. Not everything is pedophilia and when you try to paint it that way it does a disservice to efforts to fight against real pedophilia.


There’s so much gray in here that I don’t even know what you’re arguing. Let’s boil it down and you answer:

Under the premise that this girl is under the age of consent (underage), is Giddey:
a) breaking the law
B) not breaking the law

Next question. Under same premise, is Giddey engaging in:
A) pedophilia
B) not engaging in pedophilia
This post was edited on 11/23/23 at 12:43 pm
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16689 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:47 pm to
Its really not that difficult man.
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26014 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:48 pm to
Yet you won’t clearly answer the question even with how simple it appears to be for you
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60764 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:52 pm to
I mean there is an actual definition of pedophilia

It’s not sexual attraction to an underage child, its sexual attraction to a prepubescent child

He is likely engaging in ephebephilia
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
16689 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I mean there is an actual definition of pedophilia




True. But this guy wants to use the wikipedia definition and an age of consent that exists only in his own mind.
Posted by Bamadog75
Alabama
Member since Mar 2017
1393 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:59 pm to
If he's 21 and she's 17 not that big of a deal in my opinion. Her parents must be ok with it if they aren't trying to hide it.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
77587 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Under the premise that this girl is under the age of consent (underage),


OP did a terrible job presenting the facts.

There's no report that she is under the age of consent that I've seen. And OP actually never even mentions what she is under the age of, smoking age? drinking age? rental car age? driving age? age of candidacy?
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26014 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:06 pm to
I am not stating any facts about her case. This was a theoretical exercise I was setting up to better understand this dudes logic. Hence why I said “under the premise”.

The fact is: there is an allegation out there that the girl is underage. What that means? Time will tell. But we’ve evolved into a discussion on “well is that ok or not if she is under age”. Hence my questions
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
88951 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:06 pm to
Calm down bro jeez.
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26014 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:07 pm to
I’m actually pretty calm. Drinking some booze and enjoying beautiful day. WBU?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram