Started By
Message

DA decision to accept penalty

Posted on 11/5/23 at 8:05 pm
Posted by eyeofthetiger3
Mandeville, LA
Member since Dec 2007
545 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 8:05 pm
Versus 4th down and 2. Turned out to poor decision. Did he make it because he believed they would go for it?
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
10788 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 8:06 pm to
I'm sure he did. I thought they would, but then they were gonna kick on inches to go before the challenge
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
6855 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 8:32 pm to


I thought it was a bad call for multiple reasons. At that point we were playing crappy defense, so wasn’t feeling great they wouldn’t pick it up. Also pushing them back there, even if we stop them it’s still less than a 40 yard FG. No real benefit to taking it there in my opinion.
This post was edited on 11/5/23 at 8:33 pm
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3261 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 8:36 pm to
I actually agree with the decision.
Posted by Load Toad
Haughton, LA
Member since Aug 2008
1966 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 8:40 pm to
I thought DA would decline so Bears would go FG. Defense was not good today.
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
7981 posts
Posted on 11/5/23 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Did he make it because he believed they would go for it?

Doesn't matter. Saints stop it, its Saints ball.

When he took the penalty and if they don't convert the 3rd down then its 4th and ten they kick the field goal. If it 4th and 1 or 2 they go for it or kick the field goal.

We gave them another shot to convert on third down and they converted. The Saints are now on their heels and Chicago got an easy TD. It was dumb
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
4486 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 10:23 am to
It was a terrible decision.

The NFL is all about getting stops on Defense. So in lieu of a guaranteed stop situation via 4th down try or FG attempt you decided to give them another opportunity. Opportunities are what you trying to eliminate and he voluntarily gave them one.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12631 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 2:08 pm to
Yes. He said in his post game press conference that he thought they would go for it on 4th and short and wanted to back them up. Not a terrible decision unless you had no confidence that your defence could get off the field on 3rd and 12.
Posted by derrick0356
new orleans
Member since Jan 2013
278 posts
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:10 pm to
I would have accepted it too since the Bears probably would have went for it. The thought process is to back them up and hopefully your defense can get a stop.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

DA decision to accept penalty


while its understandable to look back on it now and second guess, that was a reasonable decision to back them up.

the real issue is not going up by 2 scores when it was gifted to you and you make sure the odds of you losing go up drastically, and thats what DA thought was a good strategy, to make it as easy as possible for the other team to win.
This post was edited on 11/7/23 at 12:36 pm
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
10918 posts
Posted on 11/8/23 at 2:56 pm to
I thought it was a no brainer to decline the penalty.

I guess that's why DA makes the big bux and I am just a spare fan.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram