Started By
Message

re: New evidence - New Grand jury for criminal Alec Baldwin

Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
63021 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:50 pm to
What new evidence is needed?
He shot and killed her, due to at least his negligence.
But, since he can afford good attorneys and of his notoriety, he'll never be convicted, let alone spend 5 minutes in prison.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
67135 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

But, since he can afford good attorneys and of his notoriety, he'll never be convicted, let alone spend 5 minutes in prison.


Probation, community service and a restitution-like payment to the family.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27472 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

What new evidence is needed? He shot and killed her, due to at least his negligence. But, since he can afford good attorneys and of his notoriety, he'll never be convicted, let alone spend 5 minutes in prison.


I cba to look up their laws on the subject, but I can tell you that in Louisiana, “negligent homicide” for example, requires criminal negligence, not simply negligence. So a gross deviation from the standard of care as opposed to simply a deviation. Wouldn’t surprise me if their statutes draw a similar distinction.
Posted by PuntBamaPunt
Member since Nov 2010
10070 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

But, since he can afford good attorneys and of his notoriety, he'll never be convicted, let alone spend 5 minutes in prison.


Uh, no shite. Are you twelve? That's how it's always worked for the wealthy. More breaking news at 11.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49165 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:57 pm to
I think they found new texts, it was a hit.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
40211 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

What new evidence is needed?
He shot and killed her, due to at least his negligence.

The new evidence needed is that it was due to HIS negligence. It wasn’t. Anyone objective would agree that the negligent one was primarily the armorer.

Baldwin’s main culpability was not in being the actor who fired the pistol; it was in being the producer who hired an unqualified armorer. But that would not rise to the level of a crime, although it would result in civil penalties.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram