Started By
Message

re: Titanic tourist submarine goes missing

Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
887 posts
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:09 pm to
The bonded interface between the titanium and carbon fiber is definitely sketchy. The videos with them just smearing the bonding agent on by hand in a normal warehouse look like a back yard bondo job. You would have thought they would have done it under more a controlled environment and with greater precision at least. That interface was pretty much garmented to be the weak point.

I just can't get over the plexiglass viewport. The maker would only certify to 1300M but this "genius" repeatedly takes it to 3 times that. If the viewport failed the resulting implosion could have blown out the flange/mounting hardware.

Hopefully they found enough to give a definitive answer to the cause even though it may be difficult since there seems to be several realistic failure points/design flaws.
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 9:12 pm
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

The maker would only certify to 1300M but this "genius" repeatedly takes it to 3 times that


Yea, there's really no need to dig any deeper than this. The guy obviously had no room in his budget for safety margin.

I'll have to look up those videos of them building it. I get to dabble in structural glue stuff sometimes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram