Started By
Message

Nonprofit NIL Collectives just took a hit

Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:13 pm
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
4874 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:13 pm
"Consequently, it is the view of this Office that many organizations that develop paid NIL opportunities for student-athletes are not tax exempt and described in section 501(c)(3) because the private benefits they provide to student-athletes are not incidental both qualitatively and quantitatively to any exempt purpose furthered by that activity."

Texas A&M will not be happy... They were trying to establish a tax-exempt NIL program.

IRS Guidance
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 3:14 pm
Posted by LSUcajun77
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2008
21353 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Texas A&M will not be happy


bullshite, they’ll always be gay.
Posted by jbird7
Central FL
Member since Jul 2020
5345 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:31 pm to
Good.
Posted by Scatback1
Denham
Member since Dec 2021
750 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:24 pm to
The IRS vs TX A&M... Hard to pick a side
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
5659 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Consequently, it is the view of this Office that many organizations that develop paid NIL opportunities for student-athletes are not tax exempt and described in section 501(c)(3) because the private benefits they provide to student-athletes are not incidental both qualitatively and quantitatively to any exempt purpose furthered by that activity."




Sir, this is a Wendy’s
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 4:36 pm
Posted by B00M
Member since Aug 2020
512 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:42 pm to
This should not be tax exempt. They should learn the hard lessons of taxation and maybe they will be wiser in some of the causes they support.

Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27324 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:44 pm to
For all the supposed under-the-table cash being handed out for decades in the pre-NIL era, I don’t recall a single athlete or donor being arrested or charged with tax evasion, structuring, money laundering, etc.

Always wondered about that.
Posted by uftiger
Citrus County
Member since Jan 2008
716 posts
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:53 pm to
If I had to bet, I would bet the CCM will be followed if litigated.

But it is not a slam dunk. Most of the cited cases/ruling are distinguishable because they deal with benefits outside what the supported organization does. Goldsboro and Ginsburg are inapposite.

The unaddressed issue is the broader exemption for college athletics. If deductible contributions cannot support acquisition of player rights, then why can they support many other things they support. E.g, fancy facilities or expensive coaches?

I have long doubted whether Congress would tolerate a direct attack on college athletics. This CCM is not consistent with general exemption. But, the area (indeed all of law) is fraught with inconsistencies. It will make for an interesting classroom discussion this fall.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
4874 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 9:37 am to
UFtiger, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the best way to make an NIL collective tax exempt, if it is even possible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram