Started By
Message

Tucker Goes There With WTC Building 7 Discussion

Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:21 am
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
9141 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:21 am
Yep, FOX free Tucker says what he wants here and the discussion below his comments include eye witness testimony!!

I must warn you. The potential for falling into a rabbit hole is very high.

Tucker My Man!

This post was edited on 5/1/23 at 9:27 am
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Malibu
Member since Sep 2013
29221 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:24 am to
Redacted is the best news program out there. For anyone looking to replace Fox I recommend them.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:38 am to
Poor guy, on top of the world one day and pandering to droolers the next.
Posted by L1C4
The Ville
Member since Aug 2017
13294 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:48 am to
Good Lord. Tucker is agreeing with Rosie O'Donnell. Say it ain't so.
Posted by tivey6301
Member since Jul 2011
2001 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:06 am to
I don't know if it was an inside job or not. I do know that our government will lie to us, just look at covid. When the planes hit the towers, they weakened that side. Seems logical to me that the weakened side would be the first to give way. Much like jinga, the top portion of the building would fall off to the weakened side. Yet, luckily, the buildings collapsed pretty much straight down.
Posted by QboveTopSecret
America
Member since Feb 2018
3245 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:06 am to


Bye Bye Miss American pie. Drove Mossad to the trade center when the buildings were high, with good ole boys planting thermite and lies. singing...
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119062 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:08 am to
Blue pilled normies won't like this topic at all.
Posted by DaleGribble
Bend, OR
Member since Sep 2014
6821 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:17 am to
Silverstein? Sounds Episcopalian.
Posted by RichardPound
Member since Dec 2021
133 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:18 am to
Should have made the buildings out of the hijackers passports
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7590 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:21 am to
A lot of reality bubbles are going to be burst if the building seven conspiracy theory holds true, considering the cause and effect required to make that building collapse.
Including mine.
Posted by John Coctostan
Member since May 2018
559 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:26 am to
Of course, a terrorist attack on the WTC was totally unforeseeable at the time.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119062 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:43 am to
In that Twitter thread here is video of building 7 detonation devices going off before collapse. LINK

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124250 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:




Yeah. It's not like there was a known desire in the terrorist world to destroy the WTC, right?
quote:

The 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a terrorist attack carried out on February 26, 1993, when a van bomb detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center complex in New York City. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to send the North Tower crashing into its twin, the South Tower, down both skyscrapers and killing tens of thousands of people. It failed to do so, but murdered six people, including a pregnant woman, and caused over a thousand injuries. About 50,000 people were evacuated from the buildings that day


On 9/11, WTC7 was RIDDLED with a debris blast as the towers collapsed. Red hot shrapnel, some the size of small car, blew through the base of that building.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60783 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:34 pm to
Anyone who buys the entire 9/11 explanation from our government without so much as questioning a single facet of it is not someone I care to associate with. Not willingly.
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29186 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
1650 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:00 pm to
So the conspiracy is that the guy bought insurance to cover a terrorist attack on a place that had already experienced a terrorist attack not 8 years prior?
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26763 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:39 pm to
Sept 11th wasn’t the only time someone tried to destroy the WTC, having terrorist insurance should not be unusual…

This post was edited on 5/1/23 at 2:41 pm
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21402 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:40 pm to
What I don't understand is how one single plane can destroy a building that size in such a short amount of time?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147566 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:53 pm to
When did Tucker make that short video clip? Was it taken out of context and edited?

I have never really looked into 911 theories; but wasn't Building 7 always said to have been a planned demolition because of structural damage?



Posted by Bernie Bierman
Member since Mar 2019
1219 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 3:14 pm to
Steel*clap*Beams*clap*Can’t*clap*
Melt*clap*Jet*clap*Fuel*clap*
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram