- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tough career scenario... which choice would you make?
Posted on 4/3/23 at 7:07 pm to LaBR4
Posted on 4/3/23 at 7:07 pm to LaBR4
quote:
go for Job B now.
Trust me I'm doing everything I can to accelerate the timeline on Job B while stalling on Job A, but Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role.
6
Posted on 4/3/23 at 7:10 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
but Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role
Then they have terrible bureaucracy too.."start up" shouldn't take but a few days if they want you
Posted on 4/3/23 at 7:27 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role.
Why would it take this long?
Posted on 4/3/23 at 8:29 pm to GeneralLee
quote:red flag
Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role
Posted on 4/3/23 at 9:25 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
but Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role.
If it’s a startup that still has enough untapped equity to generate life changing money for someone, no it they don’t.
Posted on 4/3/23 at 10:51 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
but Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role
This settles it. Go with job A.
Posted on 4/4/23 at 12:52 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
but Job B has a system that takes 2-3 months to hire a role.
Damn, I've never seen a startup take this long to hire someone, and I've worked for 3.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News