- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

McCarthy to bring to Floor immigration bill HR 29.... Let's talk about this bill
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:23 am
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:23 am
This is the text
PT's thoughts on this Bill?
quote:
H. R. 29
To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.
quote:
A BILL
To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Border Safety and Security Act of 2023”.
SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OF ALIENS.
(a) Authority To Suspend Entry Of Aliens At Borders Of The United States.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines, in his discretion, that the suspension of the entry of covered aliens at an international land or maritime border of the United States is necessary in order to achieve operational control over such border, the Secretary may prohibit, in whole or in part, the entry of covered aliens at such border for such period of time as the Secretary determines is necessary for such purpose.
(b) Required Suspension Of Entry Of Aliens.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prohibit the entry of covered aliens for any period during which the Secretary cannot—
(1) detain such covered aliens as required under section 235(b)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(B)); or
(2) place such covered aliens in a program consistent with section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C)).
(c) Enforcement By State Attorneys General.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of a subsection (b) that affects such State or its residents, may bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate United States district court to obtain appropriate injunctive relief.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) Except as otherwise provided, the terms have the meanings given such terms in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).
(2) The term “covered alien” means an alien seeking entry to the United States who is inadmissible under section 212(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(7)).
(3) The term “operational control” has the meaning given such term in section 2 of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note).
PT's thoughts on this Bill?
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:24 am to Jjdoc
Pandering.
Let me know when they impeach the SOB Mayorkis
Let me know when they impeach the SOB Mayorkis
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:26 am to Jjdoc
quote:
To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.
What a waste of time.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:28 am to Knartfocker
quote:
Pandering.
Let me know when they impeach the SOB Mayorkis
I'm all for his removal based on the fact that he spent money that was not authorized.
But I'm really wanting to talk about the border bill.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:28 am to Jjdoc
Things that will never pass and be signed in to law for 1000? Alex
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:30 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
I’m sure Mayorkas will do this.
What a waste of time.
I originally thought the same thing. Authorized does not = SHALL.
But then I read this section that is labeled "REQUIRED TO"
quote:
(b) Required Suspension Of Entry Of Aliens.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prohibit the entry of covered aliens for any period during which the Secretary cannot—
(1) detain such covered aliens as required under section 235(b)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(B)); or
(2) place such covered aliens in a program consistent with section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C)).
But is that enough? Is there a loophole for the GOPE and the Dems to side step this?
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:31 am to Jjdoc
Looks like a law designed to make us follow the law.
D.C. is pretty useless.
D.C. is pretty useless.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:32 am to Loserman
This is not to close the border, it's to get a vote on record of which politicians support closing and which one's support keeping it open..............a political campaigning tool.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:34 am to Jjdoc
This is all show. He knows the Senate and President will prevent anything passing into action.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:35 am to Bandit1980
quote:
This is not to close the border, it's to get a vote on record of which politicians support closing and which one's support keeping it open..............a political campaigning tool.
Maybe. We already know that the GOP has a few people holding out.
If it passes it still has a process to go through
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:35 am to Jjdoc
DHS and President already have these powers to suspend entry and even asylum if they want.
Where is the jan6 video, did Kevin address that?
Where is the jan6 video, did Kevin address that?
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:37 am to Jjdoc
quote:
To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.
Empowering another bureaucratic office with powers not designated in the Constitution? No thanks.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:38 am to Jjdoc
Like the concept, not sure how well it will be applied.
For historical perspective, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which is one of the most famous business regulation acts in US history, was initially misused so that the trusts in question could harass the labor organizations looking to break the trusts.
For historical perspective, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which is one of the most famous business regulation acts in US history, was initially misused so that the trusts in question could harass the labor organizations looking to break the trusts.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:42 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Empowering another bureaucratic office with powers not designated in the Constitution? No thanks.
Actually the dept has that power already. What this Bill supposedly seeks to do is force that dept to do it's job.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:43 am to 1999
quote:
suspend all immigration.
We can agree.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:44 am to Jjdoc
quote:The secretary is already required to do all of that.
But then I read this section that is labeled "REQUIRED TO"
The problem is the secretary simply ignores the law. (and he’ll ignore this one too).
He need to be impeached and removed. Biden too for not removing him first.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:46 am to Jjdoc
Taking an argument away from Mayorkas and calling his play.
Making dems go on record of where they stand in the senate.
Making dems go on record of where they stand in the senate.
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:47 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:Yep. This too. Giving the DHS secretary arbitrary powers isn’t a good thing. Just another example of Congress ceding power to the executive branch.
Empowering another bureaucratic office with powers not designated in the Constitution?
It’s an open question why McCarthy is (allegedly) trying to do that during the e Biden administration. Republicans in congress should be doing the opposite with their majority.
Popular
Back to top


16









