Started By
Message
locked post

McCarthy to bring to Floor immigration bill HR 29.... Let's talk about this bill

Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:23 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:23 am
This is the text


quote:

H. R. 29

To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.


quote:

A BILL
To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Border Safety and Security Act of 2023”.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OF ALIENS.

(a) Authority To Suspend Entry Of Aliens At Borders Of The United States.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines, in his discretion, that the suspension of the entry of covered aliens at an international land or maritime border of the United States is necessary in order to achieve operational control over such border, the Secretary may prohibit, in whole or in part, the entry of covered aliens at such border for such period of time as the Secretary determines is necessary for such purpose.

(b) Required Suspension Of Entry Of Aliens.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prohibit the entry of covered aliens for any period during which the Secretary cannot—

(1) detain such covered aliens as required under section 235(b)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(B)); or

(2) place such covered aliens in a program consistent with section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C)).

(c) Enforcement By State Attorneys General.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of a subsection (b) that affects such State or its residents, may bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate United States district court to obtain appropriate injunctive relief.

(d) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Except as otherwise provided, the terms have the meanings given such terms in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).

(2) The term “covered alien” means an alien seeking entry to the United States who is inadmissible under section 212(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(7)).

(3) The term “operational control” has the meaning given such term in section 2 of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note).







PT's thoughts on this Bill?
Posted by Knartfocker
Member since Jun 2020
1656 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:24 am to
Pandering.

Let me know when they impeach the SOB Mayorkis
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62508 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:26 am to
quote:

To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.
I’m sure Mayorkas will do this.

What a waste of time.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Pandering.

Let me know when they impeach the SOB Mayorkis




I'm all for his removal based on the fact that he spent money that was not authorized.


But I'm really wanting to talk about the border bill.


Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:28 am to
No wall, the bill is crap...
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23047 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:28 am to
Things that will never pass and be signed in to law for 1000? Alex
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I’m sure Mayorkas will do this.

What a waste of time.


I originally thought the same thing. Authorized does not = SHALL.

But then I read this section that is labeled "REQUIRED TO"

quote:

(b) Required Suspension Of Entry Of Aliens.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prohibit the entry of covered aliens for any period during which the Secretary cannot—

(1) detain such covered aliens as required under section 235(b)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(B)); or

(2) place such covered aliens in a program consistent with section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C)).



But is that enough? Is there a loophole for the GOPE and the Dems to side step this?


Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
8407 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:31 am to
Looks like a law designed to make us follow the law.

D.C. is pretty useless.
Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
4418 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:32 am to
This is not to close the border, it's to get a vote on record of which politicians support closing and which one's support keeping it open..............a political campaigning tool.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77919 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:34 am to
This is all show. He knows the Senate and President will prevent anything passing into action.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:35 am to
quote:

This is not to close the border, it's to get a vote on record of which politicians support closing and which one's support keeping it open..............a political campaigning tool.


Maybe. We already know that the GOP has a few people holding out.

If it passes it still has a process to go through
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:35 am to
DHS and President already have these powers to suspend entry and even asylum if they want.

Where is the jan6 video, did Kevin address that?
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43893 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:37 am to
quote:

To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of aliens, and for other purposes.



Empowering another bureaucratic office with powers not designated in the Constitution? No thanks.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103111 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:38 am to
Like the concept, not sure how well it will be applied.


For historical perspective, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which is one of the most famous business regulation acts in US history, was initially misused so that the trusts in question could harass the labor organizations looking to break the trusts.
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
32994 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:39 am to
suspend all immigration.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Empowering another bureaucratic office with powers not designated in the Constitution? No thanks.


Actually the dept has that power already. What this Bill supposedly seeks to do is force that dept to do it's job.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:43 am to
quote:

suspend all immigration.


We can agree.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62508 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

But then I read this section that is labeled "REQUIRED TO"
The secretary is already required to do all of that.

The problem is the secretary simply ignores the law. (and he’ll ignore this one too).

He need to be impeached and removed. Biden too for not removing him first.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108088 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:46 am to
Taking an argument away from Mayorkas and calling his play.

Making dems go on record of where they stand in the senate.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62508 posts
Posted on 3/29/23 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Empowering another bureaucratic office with powers not designated in the Constitution?
Yep. This too. Giving the DHS secretary arbitrary powers isn’t a good thing. Just another example of Congress ceding power to the executive branch.

It’s an open question why McCarthy is (allegedly) trying to do that during the e Biden administration. Republicans in congress should be doing the opposite with their majority.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram