Started By
Message

re: Livingston Parish 1% tax for teacher raises fails to pass

Posted on 3/30/23 at 11:43 pm to
Posted by OneAyedJack
Watson
Member since Sep 2019
219 posts
Posted on 3/30/23 at 11:43 pm to
quote:


Bro they’re home by 330 every day


Geeez. No they're not.

quote:

and work 38 weeks a year.


Incorrect once again.

quote:

They’ve got good benefits


Please list these for me. When they reach retirement eligibility in the LP, they earn 57k/year. I hope you don't think they go home with that, do you? They get to go home with 75% of 57k after 30 years of service.

quote:

and can retire at 52


Not sure where this number came from...? There is not "retirement age." Teachers earn 2.5%/year of their annual salary toward their retirement and in order to retire without taking a substantial penalty, MUST work 30 years. That's 75% of their salary they go home with as a pension.

quote:

Plus they chose their profession


What does this mean? In the private sector, people "choose" their professions. They also negotiate their salaries and can simply walk into their boss man's office and ask for a pay increase. If they don't get what they are looking for, they can take their services across the street.

Are you saying that because a teacher "chose" to be a teacher, they should not look to improve their take home pay? How does this make sense in your world?

Everything is going up right now, but teacher pay remains the same.

The situation is this; a single parent (teacher) with 2 kids in LP, cannot afford to LIVE in the parish in which they teach. Don't you think that's a bit silly?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68431 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 12:51 am to
quote:

The situation is this; a single parent (teacher) with 2 kids in LP, cannot afford to LIVE in the parish in which they teach. Don't you think that's a bit silly?
No. They can choose to teach elsewhere. We all can do as much. You don't like your situation, move to a situation you find more palatable.
This post was edited on 3/31/23 at 12:51 am
Posted by JAMAC2001
Member since Jan 2013
2764 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:31 am to
quote:

The situation is this; a single parent (teacher) with 2 kids in LP, cannot afford to LIVE in the parish in which they teach. Don't you think that's a bit silly?


Overall you made some good points, except this one.

Not affording to live (comfortably), is caused by being a single parent of 2 kids. Not unique to the teaching profession.

That said, I have no issues with teachers earning a higher salary. I'd hope it would attract more quality teachers to the profession and give more leverage for administrators to can the shitty ones.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17286 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 2:39 am to
quote:

What does this mean? In the private sector, people "choose" their professions. They also negotiate their salaries and can simply walk into their boss man's office and ask for a pay increase. If they don't get what they are looking for, they can take their services across the street.


And if the boss man says no, and the employee throws a fit and starts doing stupid shite like sick outs and not giving it their best, they can be shown the door
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
4915 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 7:13 am to
22 plus 30 is 52.
Medical, dental, paid time off
Wife’s a teacher, does car duty, home by 330
48k a year is 4 grand a month, plus 1k a month for dem kids in child support. So should be clearing 4k a month.
You’re still just dismissing that they work 190 days a year, minus their paid time off. Ur average baw with four weeks vacation is doing 240 days and he ain’t retiring with a guaranteed check at 52, so go ahead and tac on another 13 years.

Nobody hates it more than me that these gals wanted to be teachers but they knew it sucked.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
16143 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

The situation is this; a single parent (teacher) with 2 kids in LP, cannot afford to LIVE in the parish in which they teach. Don't you think that's a bit silly?


So it’s a cost of living problem.

Ok then, let’s delve into this.

Why is their cost of living so high?

Are they the only ones facing these increasingly higher living costs?
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2134 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

The situation is this; a single parent (teacher) with 2 kids in LP, cannot afford to LIVE in the parish in which they teach.


They can if you consider their salary, child support, numerous tax credits/benefits, and potentially alimony.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
5744 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

The situation is this; a single parent (teacher) with 2 kids in LP, cannot afford to LIVE in the parish in which they teach. Don't you think that's a bit silly?


Yes that sales tax is very high. Thankfully for single parents with 2 kids the sales tax was not increased.
This post was edited on 4/1/23 at 11:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram