- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latoya recall has failed. Only had 27k signatures. edit: 40k signatures were rejected
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:53 pm to NoSaint
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:53 pm to NoSaint
quote:
Or they turned in the strong batch first and their own internal audit concerns later to minimize the time the registrar would have them in hand
If so, they might have screwed up big time. From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
“Signature dated before petitioner deadline” was one of the rejection reasons listed under “other.”
4
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:18 pm to lostinbr
quote:
From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
So they could blanket reject all of those additional signatures because they weren't on time?
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:24 pm to lostinbr
quote:
If so, they might have screwed up big time. From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
If true lmao
Posted on 3/21/23 at 1:36 pm to lostinbr
quote:
If so, they might have screwed up big time. From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered. “Signature dated before petitioner deadline” was one of the rejection reasons listed under “other.”
Could be.
There’s a reality that we all know they didn’t get 30k signatures that week so we will see if they still audited and bounced a bunch for standard reasons and the rest “other” due to that
Posted on 3/21/23 at 2:39 pm to lostinbr
quote:
If so, they might have screwed up big time. From what I understand reading the documentation from the registrar, the 5 day grace period only applies to new signatures and any signatures obtained prior to the original deadline would have had to go in the first batch to be considered.
If this failed due to having plenty enough signatures but not being turned in on time... that is peak NOLA.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News