- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
“Special assessment on banks” - Can someone explain?
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:00 pm
quote:Can someone explain to me what this ACTUALLY means and how it will affect us all?
The government’s bank-deposit insurance fund will cover all deposits at the two banks, rather than the standard $250,000. Federal regulators said any losses to the government’s fund would be recovered in a special assessment on banks and that the U.S. taxpayers wouldn’t bear any losses.
Maybe it’s just me, but I feel that, someway, somehow, the US taxpayer will “bear” this.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:19 pm to Scruffy
All FDIC insured banks pay Deposit Insurance premiums to help keep the Deposit Insurance Fund with enough funds to cover the insured deposits. There is formula for the banks to make their quarterly assessments.
LINK to FDIC assessment methodology
Side note- Banks will be screaming about being assessed to cover non-insured deposits so it should get interesting.
LINK to FDIC assessment methodology
Side note- Banks will be screaming about being assessed to cover non-insured deposits so it should get interesting.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:20 pm to BlueDogTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/27/23 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:25 pm to TigerIron
Well SVB is now in receivership so it’s owned by the FDIC and they are covering. The Failed Bank review will be interesting on this one. Don’t think they had large credit losses to drive them under. Just unrealized losses on bonds.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:28 pm to thelawnwranglers
So yes. Banks pay taxes unlike credit unions so taxpayers will be covering it. And passing it along to account holders via fees etc.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:28 pm to BlueDogTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 9:12 am
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:32 pm to BlueDogTiger
quote:
Banks will be screaming about being assessed to cover non-insured deposits
I doubt this. I imagine most were all about this to avoid amore disruptive regulations and/or costs.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:34 pm to Scruffy
I am not sure there is a huge delta in asset and debts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
doubt this. I imagine most were all about this to avoid amore disruptive regulations and/or costs.
Maybe so. We will see how it goes.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:51 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Can someone explain to me what this ACTUALLY means and how it will affect us all? Maybe it’s just me, but I feel that, someway, somehow, the US taxpayer will “bear” this.
It means all banks in the federal reserve system will be assessed a fee or “tax” for the losses incurred with bank failures. Banks can either absorb those fees/taxes in their profit and losses which will affect their dividends (shareholders) or they can pass it down to their customers in increasing fees.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 3/13/23 at 6:40 am to Scruffy
Not a tax on taxpayers. It’s a tax on everyone that uses a bank…
Posted on 3/13/23 at 6:45 am to BigPerm30
Most bank users are tax payers. A lot of non tax payers are the “make it out to cash” types
Popular
Back to top
5








