Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

“Special assessment on banks” - Can someone explain?

Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:00 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76603 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:00 pm
quote:

The gov­ern­ment’s bank-de­posit in­sur­ance fund will cover all de­posits at the two banks, rather than the stan­dard $250,000. Fed­eral reg­u­la­tors said any losses to the gov­ern­ment’s fund would be re­cov­ered in a spe­cial as­sess­ment on banks and that the U.S. tax­pay­ers wouldn’t bear any losses.
Can someone explain to me what this ACTUALLY means and how it will affect us all?

Maybe it’s just me, but I feel that, someway, somehow, the US taxpayer will “bear” this.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 9:10 pm
Posted by BlueDogTiger
Member since Jan 2014
1430 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:19 pm to
All FDIC insured banks pay Deposit Insurance premiums to help keep the Deposit Insurance Fund with enough funds to cover the insured deposits. There is formula for the banks to make their quarterly assessments.

LINK to FDIC assessment methodology

Side note- Banks will be screaming about being assessed to cover non-insured deposits so it should get interesting.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 9:21 pm
Posted by TigerIron
Member since Feb 2021
3875 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:20 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/27/23 at 1:53 pm
Posted by BlueDogTiger
Member since Jan 2014
1430 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:25 pm to
Well SVB is now in receivership so it’s owned by the FDIC and they are covering. The Failed Bank review will be interesting on this one. Don’t think they had large credit losses to drive them under. Just unrealized losses on bonds.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42036 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:27 pm to
That's tax baw
Posted by BlueDogTiger
Member since Jan 2014
1430 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:28 pm to
So yes. Banks pay taxes unlike credit unions so taxpayers will be covering it. And passing it along to account holders via fees etc.
Posted by TigerIron
Member since Feb 2021
3875 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:28 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 9:12 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466946 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Banks will be screaming about being assessed to cover non-insured deposits

I doubt this. I imagine most were all about this to avoid amore disruptive regulations and/or costs.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42036 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:34 pm to
I am not sure there is a huge delta in asset and debts
Posted by BlueDogTiger
Member since Jan 2014
1430 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

doubt this. I imagine most were all about this to avoid amore disruptive regulations and/or costs.


Maybe so. We will see how it goes.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11640 posts
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Can someone explain to me what this ACTUALLY means and how it will affect us all? Maybe it’s just me, but I feel that, someway, somehow, the US taxpayer will “bear” this.


It means all banks in the federal reserve system will be assessed a fee or “tax” for the losses incurred with bank failures. Banks can either absorb those fees/taxes in their profit and losses which will affect their dividends (shareholders) or they can pass it down to their customers in increasing fees.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 10:21 pm
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
31094 posts
Posted on 3/13/23 at 6:40 am to
Not a tax on taxpayers. It’s a tax on everyone that uses a bank…
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32759 posts
Posted on 3/13/23 at 6:45 am to
Most bank users are tax payers. A lot of non tax payers are the “make it out to cash” types
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram