- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:06 pm to blueagateblues
quote:
Are the pro-life people going to lobby for paid maternity leave, paid child care, headstart and better SNAP/WIC benefits? Thought not.
Are irresponsible men and women going to abstain from sex until marriage, or use protection to prevent pregnancy? Thought not.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:14 pm to AggieHank86
Taxpayers fund the maintenance of the grounds. If we don’t allow gatherings on public grounds, then how is it public?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:42 pm to djmed
quote:
a park ranger told them they were in a "First Amendment-free zone"
This didn't just happen in the USA. It happened in the nation's capital - supposedly the place that stands for freedom in this country.
Freedom is under attack by a bunch of freedom-hating, commie loving, socialist idiots who have no moral compass.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:48 pm to 93and99
quote:
personal responsibility
Always amusing seeing this point made by someone who wants to make choices for others.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:53 pm to blueagateblues
quote:
Are the pro-life people going to lobby for paid maternity leave, paid child care, headstart and better SNAP/WIC benefits? Thought not.
Fun fact: The only people in Congress pushing for paid parental leave are Republicans. (Mitt, Rubio, Crenshaw, etc.)
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:55 pm to djmed
The"perps" should have asked the park ranger what specific statute inside the Federal Code is he citing and can he provide documentation to back that up.
Hint: There is no place run by the government open to the public that is designated a First Amendment Free zone.
Hint: There is no place run by the government open to the public that is designated a First Amendment Free zone.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:00 pm to djmed
Their mistake was complying. They should have said “arrest me for doing a perfectly legal activity protected by the constitution and see how fast you get sued for a “1983” violation. I double dog dare you”.
Just like the folks that were threatened with arrest for witnessing the election shenanigans, if you are threatened and you leave, there is no record. If you are in the right and are arrested, there’s a record.
ETA…
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Just like the folks that were threatened with arrest for witnessing the election shenanigans, if you are threatened and you leave, there is no record. If you are in the right and are arrested, there’s a record.
ETA…
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:24 pm to djmed
This country in a nut shell. I find it sad that so many are afraid we might lose our country. They just don't realize "your" country is already gone.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:27 pm to International_Aggie
quote:
False equivalency.
How about we start with not killing babies first.
How about ending dems birthday abortion ideology.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:31 pm to Bunta
quote:
Of course you didn’t address the actual issue here and instead posted this drivel, thinking it’s some sort of gotcha. Dumbass.
Classic progressive misdirection.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:35 pm to djmed
I really really really hope that some gay/trans or BLM group sets up shop near one of the monuments in DC and someone complains and see if they uphold their policy equally between groups such as BLM or Pro-life groups.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:37 pm to djmed
It will continue to happen until we do sothmeing about it!
J6 needs to happen again, and again....until they listen.
J6 needs to happen again, and again....until they listen.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:56 pm to djmed
I think the "policy" is designed to keep the concrete circle around the monument clear.
Every time I've been to the mall there were small protests, tee pees, flag vendors, petition tables etc. scattered all over, and every one would probably like to set up where all the walkways intersect at the monument.
Can't see how the zone or whatever they call it is legal constitionally though.
Every time I've been to the mall there were small protests, tee pees, flag vendors, petition tables etc. scattered all over, and every one would probably like to set up where all the walkways intersect at the monument.
Can't see how the zone or whatever they call it is legal constitionally though.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:26 pm to GoT1de
Some areas require permits to assemble and protest.
It wouldn't shock me if something as popular as the Washington monument requires a minimum level of red tape to arrange for such a demonstration.
It wouldn't shock me if something as popular as the Washington monument requires a minimum level of red tape to arrange for such a demonstration.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 10:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Setting aside for the moment the question of whether the Parks Service has the Constitutional authority to limit WHERE protests are held ...
You mean setting aside the actual issue at hand here, right pedophile?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 10:26 pm to djmed
First Amendment free zone? Is there a crazy liberal scumbag free zone?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 10:35 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
I don't want us to be
He doesn’t want to be, he wants you to be
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News