Caught the segment… they asked if he would press charges and he backed off, didn’t want to ruin their lives.

Dudes a coward. Prosecute those evil fricks. He’s really gonna feel bad when one of those three kills someone soon. Although, even if he pressed charges, Brag would let them off.

Adams, Brag, Holkel… all cowards

5 ...

Report Post

Posted by AggieHank86

Texas

Member since Sep 2013

42941 posts

Posted on 1/23/23 at 7:18 am to Lsut81

quote:
Caught the segment… they asked if he would press charges and he backed off, didn’t want to ruin their lives.

inconsistent with the OP. Which is correct?

EDIT

Found the following in the New York Post

quote:
A rep for the city Law Department, which prosecutes juvenile crimes in the Big Apple, said in an e-mail that the victim has to file a complaint with the Department of Probation before it gets involved. Probation would then decide whether to refer the case to the Law Department for prosecution, the representative said.

Sounds as if they were not charged at the scene because they were juveniles. Klotz can still have them charged in the juvenile system, if he files a formal complaint. Sounds like he is not going to exercise that option.

Basically, he is complaining that "someone should do something," while declining to do his part to get the ball rolling in the system.

Additionally, New York law allows the 17-year-old to be charged as an adult.

This post was edited on 1/23/23 at 8:30 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by RCDfan1950

United States

Member since Feb 2007

35167 posts

Posted on 1/23/23 at 7:20 am to Lsut81

quote:
Caught the segment… they asked if he would press charges and he backed off, didn’t want to ruin their lives.

Yeah, real compassionate. When one of his Daughters or Sons gets whacked, he'll bear that as an enabler. Whatever we tolerate, we get more of.

The Left WILL try to take the guns that civil, loving and responsible people hold to defend against these feral heathens. That will be a line in the sand for many. Albeit, I have no idea how one 'rebels' against such action when their bank accounts and access to (Government run) basic life sustaining goods and services are 'canceled'. 'Terrorism' most likely. One person's 'terrorist' is another's righteous freedom fighter.

The easy days are coming to an end. Drip, drip...drip.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jorts R Us

Member since Aug 2013

14930 posts

Posted on 1/23/23 at 8:23 am to Lsut81

quote:
they asked if he would press charges and he backed off, didn’t want to ruin their lives.

He's got a point. This is just a phase. They'll eventually outgrow setting other human beings on fire and contribute something meaningful to society. Just have to get through the growing pains of adolescence. Sure, a few other lives may be ruined along the way but living ain't free.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Mike Honcho

North Dallas

Member since Oct 2007

2928 posts

Posted on 1/23/23 at 9:34 am to Lsut81

How do people not get this. If you let them off for this then they will just keep doing it or more likely escalate and kill someone. These kids don't have any respect for life or civilized society. You punish them for small things that way they have a chance to recover before they kill someone and have to go away permanently.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BuckyCheese