- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did out of bounds Bama player have to reestablish himself to become a legal participant
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:40 am
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:40 am
(no message)
17
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:42 am to Poboytom
Apparently not. The entire scenario makes no sense.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:43 am to Poboytom
No. The rule is stupid and was applied correctly.
Rule needs changed.
Rule needs changed.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:46 am to Poboytom
If he would have come back in bounds then he would have had to reestablish himself before being the first one to touch the ball.
He did not in this scenario because he was out of bounds and did not come back in bounds and also because he was not the first one to touch the ball. The LSU player was already touching the ball.
The rule is dumb but was enforced correctly.
He did not in this scenario because he was out of bounds and did not come back in bounds and also because he was not the first one to touch the ball. The LSU player was already touching the ball.
The rule is dumb but was enforced correctly.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:55 am to Poboytom
Here's what I love about it.
If you're standing on the sideline - whether you're a player in the game or not in the game, or a coach, or a GA, or a trainer, or just a fan - and see your team fumble the ball and an opposing player about to recover it, just reach out and touch the ball before anyone else does and it's your ball right there.
Well, if you're not in the game maybe after a penalty - but it's YOUR BALL!
Is this not the implication of that rule?
If you're standing on the sideline - whether you're a player in the game or not in the game, or a coach, or a GA, or a trainer, or just a fan - and see your team fumble the ball and an opposing player about to recover it, just reach out and touch the ball before anyone else does and it's your ball right there.
Well, if you're not in the game maybe after a penalty - but it's YOUR BALL!
Is this not the implication of that rule?
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:56 am to Poboytom
Re-establishment only applies to catching a pass.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:24 am to Poboytom
It should be that if you’re out of bounds, you’re out of the play and if you touch the ball, it doesn’t matter.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:26 am to Poboytom
There isn’t a rule To reestablish in this scenario
The only thing lsu fans can question is the conclusiveness of what they saw on replay as it must be certain to overturn.
Referees were sloppy and inconsistent calling the game Saturday and this is an example of that, but the ruling was technically correct, and the ruling required judgement from the booth
The only thing lsu fans can question is the conclusiveness of what they saw on replay as it must be certain to overturn.
Referees were sloppy and inconsistent calling the game Saturday and this is an example of that, but the ruling was technically correct, and the ruling required judgement from the booth
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:26 am to Poboytom
No. He was forced out by the defender during the initial contact.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:27 am to Poboytom
That entire episode was informed completely by tortured logic. "Did not complete the possession." 
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:39 am to Poboytom
Lsu had possession. Didn't matter if he touched it.
Can you without a doubt confirm he touched it?
Without a doubt lsu didn't have possession?
Can you without a doubt confirm he touched it?
Without a doubt lsu didn't have possession?
Posted on 11/8/22 at 11:08 am to Poboytom
The point you're missing is tha the Bama player touched WHILE HE WAS OUT OF BOUNDS. Dead ball. That's always been the rule, and it's a fine rule.
'Re-establishing" has to do with making a reception or establishing possession. That happens AFTER a player went out and then came back in.
Get over it. It was an unfortunate call, but the right one.
'Re-establishing" has to do with making a reception or establishing possession. That happens AFTER a player went out and then came back in.
Get over it. It was an unfortunate call, but the right one.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 11:16 am to Poboytom
No boundaries for bama
Posted on 11/8/22 at 11:49 am to Poboytom
Yes. He was an illegal participant. That's the whole point. It's a dead ball immediately when someone out of bounds touches the ball.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 3:05 pm to Poboytom
look, I'd never heard of that rule, but it's apparently what it is. The TV rules analyst immediately called it, so he knows the rule.
The Bama guy touched was OB and touched the ball (yes, before our player had possession) so it's a dead ball and goes back to the offense.
Stupid rule, in my opinion, but it seems to be correctly applied. I do hope they change it in the off-season, because it seems very unfair.
The Bama guy touched was OB and touched the ball (yes, before our player had possession) so it's a dead ball and goes back to the offense.
Stupid rule, in my opinion, but it seems to be correctly applied. I do hope they change it in the off-season, because it seems very unfair.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 3:58 pm to Poboytom
That rule doesn’t apply in that situation. It’s why sometimes you will see a kick returner lay out of bounds on a kickoff and field the kick, it is ruled an out of bounds kick and they receiving team would get the ball at the 35 yard line
Example video
Example video
Posted on 11/8/22 at 4:41 pm to Poboytom
He wasn’t a legal participant when he touched the ball. He became an extension of that sideline and therefore the ball was also considered OB at that spot.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News