- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Yet another botched call that went mostly unnoticed: Illegal man downfield on first drive
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:35 pm
quote:
Jeff Duncan
@JeffDuncan_
·
35s
The refs appeared to have botched the call on the Saints' opening drive vs MIN. Cesar Ruiz was ruled an ineligible man downfield on a screen to Mark Ingram, but Ingram caught the ball behind the line of scrimmage, making Ruiz legal. Same scenario on MIN's 1st TD & refs let it go.
LINK
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:37 pm to Fun Bunch
something about us and MN just seems odd - like they are paying us pack for injuring Favre in 2009
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:41 pm to Thracken13
Roger’s wife is a Vikings fan.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:44 pm to Fun Bunch
Refs were horrible. That last Vikings drive was no different than the TB game.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:12 pm to Fun Bunch
I will never understand, for all plays, why there isn't some immediate secondary review for things like this that have a huge negative impact.
The technology is too good. I know people will say, it'll slow the game down, blah blah blah, but the announcers and the former ref on call can provide a relatively immediate analysis on the legitimacy of a call.
I'd rather it be right, than say, eh, rules don't allow it to be looked at.
The technology is too good. I know people will say, it'll slow the game down, blah blah blah, but the announcers and the former ref on call can provide a relatively immediate analysis on the legitimacy of a call.
I'd rather it be right, than say, eh, rules don't allow it to be looked at.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 3:00 pm to Fun Bunch
I immediately thought this live but gaslit myself thinking "yeah if that were the rule they would have said so"
Posted on 10/4/22 at 3:22 pm to VaeVictus
quote:
I will never understand, for all plays, why there isn't some immediate secondary review for things like this that have a huge negative impact.
CFL does this and gets it right every time. CFL is a better run league
Posted on 10/4/22 at 5:26 pm to whodat22
It’s because the NFL wants it this way. They cannot control it if things are on the up and up. Another week of what ifs like always, like a Saints fan.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 5:51 pm to VaeVictus
quote:
I will never understand, for all plays, why there isn't some immediate secondary review for things like this that have a huge negative impact.
Because then the NFL can’t manipulate the games as easily
Posted on 10/4/22 at 6:00 pm to Fun Bunch
That was the right call against the saints but the Vikings should’ve been hit with the same penalty
Posted on 10/4/22 at 6:09 pm to Fun Bunch
Vikings fan on their forum suggested the refs should get the game ball lol
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:06 pm to Wadey
I got to say that this year feels more scripted than WWF wrestling....reminds me of popular television. It's so outrageous it can't be real. The conspiracy theorist is starting to unzip my flesh to daylight in reality.
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:16 am to Fun Bunch
I don't think Duncan knows the rules.
In college, a catch behind the line eliminates the possibility of illegal man downfield. But, in the NFL, that's not the case.
He's wrong.
In college, a catch behind the line eliminates the possibility of illegal man downfield. But, in the NFL, that's not the case.
He's wrong.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News